Drawing on the literatures discussed in one of more of the Lectures in Part 1 of the module I put all the literatures review down here: Additional Reading Downer J. (2007) When the Chick Hits the Fan: Representativeness and Reproducibility in Technological Tests. Social Studies of Science. 37(1):7-26. doi:10.1177\/0306312706064235 Hopkins, A. 1999. The Limits of Normal Accident Theory. Safety Science. 32(1-3):93-102 Shrivastava, P. Mitroff, I. Miller, D and Migliani, A. 1988. \u2018Understanding Industrial Crises\u2019. Journal of Management Studies, 25: 4, pp. 285 ff. Toft, B. Limits to the Mathematical Modelling of Disasters in Hood, C. and Jones, D.K.C. (eds) 1996. Accident and Design: Contemporary debates in risk management. London: UCL-Press. pp.99 ff. (available online through KCL library). Minimum Reading Pidgeon, N. and O\u2019Leary, M. 2000. Man-made disasters: why technology and organizations (sometimes) fail. Safety Science. 34(1-3):15-30 Additional Reading Bensman, J. and Gerver, I. (1963) Crime and Punishment in the Factory: The Function of Deviancy in Maintaining the Social System. American Sociological Review 28(4): 588-598 Downer, J. 2010. Anatomy of a disaster: why some accidents are unavoidable. CARR Discussion Papers, DP 61. Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, LSE Gephart, R.P., Jr., (1984), `Making Sense of Organizationally Based Environmental Disasters’, Journal of Management, Volume 10, Number 2, June, pp. 205-225. * Janis, I. 1982. Groupthink. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Kuhn, T. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd ed). Chicago, Chicago University Press Pidgeon, N. 1991. Safety Culture and Risk Management in Organizati. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology22(1):129-1422(1):129-14 Pidgeon, N. 1997. The Limits to Safety? Culture, Politics, Learning and Man\u2013Made Disasters 5(1):1-14 Reason, J. 1991. Human Error. CUP * Reason, J. 2000. \u2018Human Error: models and management\u2019, British Medical Journal. 320:768-70 (e-resource King\u2019s Library Richardson, W. 1993. \u2018Identifying the Cultural Causes of Disasters: An analysis of the Hillsborough Football Stadium Disaster\u2019 Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Vol 1 (1) pp.27ff. Turner, B. 1976. The Organizational and Interorganizational Development of Disasters Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3): 378-397 * Turner, B. and Pidgeon, N. 1997. Man-made Disasters. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann * Vaughan, D. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: risky technology, culture and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (available online through KCL library). Vaughan, D. 2005. Organisational rituals of trial and error. in Hutter, B. and Power, M. (eds) 2005. Organisational Encounters with Risk. Cambridge: CUP. (available online through KCL library). Weir, D. 1996. \u2018Risk and Disaster\u2019. In Hood, C. and Jones, D.K.C. (eds) 1996. Accident and Design: Contemporary debates in risk management. London: UCL-Press. pp.114 ff. (available online through KCL library). 1:Minimum Reading Perrow, C. 1984. Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Especially Ch\u2019s.1, 2, 3 & 9 (available online through KCL library) Additional Reading Minimum Reading Roberts, K. 1990. Managing High Reliability Organizations. California Management Review. 32(4): 101-113 (available online through KCL library). Additional Reading Boin, A. and Schulman, P. 2008. Assessing NASA\u2019s Safety Culture: The Limits and Possibilities of High-Reliability Theory. Public Administration Review. 68(6):1050-62 Helmreich, R. 18.3.2000. \u2018On error management: lessons from aviation\u2019 British Medical Journal, 320:781-785 Hopkins, A. 2007. The Problem of Defining High Reliability Organisations. Working Paper 51. National Research Centre for OHS Regulation. Australian National University. * Hood, C. and Jones, D.K.C. (eds) 1996. Accident and Design: Contemporary debates in risk management. London: UCL-Press, Chapter 3 on Liability and Blame (esp. essays by Horlick Jones and A. Neil Johnston) . (available online through KCL library). Hutter, B. 2005. \u2018Ways of Seeing: understanding risk in organisational settings\u2019 in Hutter, B. and Power, M. (eds) 2005. Organisational Encounters with Risk. Cambridge: CUP (available online through KCL library) LaPorte, T. and Consolini, P. 1991. \u2018Working in Practice but Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of “High-Reliability Organizations\u2019. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 1(1): 19-48 * Lekka, C. 2011. High reliability organisations: A review of the literature. Health and Safety Executive. Provera, B., Montefusco, A. and Canato, A. 2010. A \u2018No Blame\u2019 Approach to Organizational Learning. British Journal of Management. 21(4):1057-1074 Rijpma, J. 2002. Complexity, Tight\u2013Coupling and Reliability: Connecting Normal Accidents Theory and High Reliability Theory. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 5(1):15-23 (available online through KCL library). Roberts, K. 1990. \u2018Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organizations\u2019. Organization Science. 1 (2): 160-176 (available through e-journals, KCL library) * Sagan, S. 1993. The Limits of Safety. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (available online through KCL library). Weick, K. (1987) \u2018Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability\u2019. California Management Review. XXIX (2): 112-127 (available online through KCL library). Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K and Obstfeld, D. 1999. \u2018Organizing for High Reliability: Processes of Collective Mindfulness\u2019 in Sutton, R. and Staw, B., Research in Organizational Behavior, Volume 21: pp. 81\u2013123 Minimum Reading Hood,C. \u2018Where Extremes Meet: \u201cSPRAT\u201d vs \u201cSHARK\u201d in Public Risk Management\u2019 in Hood, C. and Jones, D.K.C. (eds) 1996. Accident and Design: Contemporary debates in risk management. London: UCL-Press. pp.208-227 (available online through KCL library). Additional Reading Collingridge, D. 1996. \u2018Resilience, Flexibility and Diversity in Managing the Risks of Technologies\u2019 in Hood, C. and Jones, D.K.C. (eds) 1996. Accident and Design: Contemporary debates in risk management. London: UCL-Press, pp.40-45 (available online through KCL library). * Cox, L (2008) \u2018What\u2019s Wrong with Risk Matrices?\u2019 Risk Analysis, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2008 Glossop, M. et al (2000) Review of Hazard Identification Techniques. HSL\/2005\/58. HSL Hillson, D. (2006) The Risk Management Universe: A Guided Tour. London: British Standards Institute Hood, C. and Rothstein, H. (2000) ‘Business Risk Management in Government: Pitfalls and Possibilities\u2019. In Annex 2 in Report by the Comptroller and Auditor-General: Supporting Innovation: Managing Risk in Government Departments. National Audit Office. HMSO. HC864 Session 1999-2000 Hood, C. and Rothstein, H. (2001) Risk Regulation Under Pressure: Problem solving or Blame shifting? Administration & Society 33(1):21-53 * Hood, C. 2002. \u2018The risk game and the blame game\u2019, Government and Opposition 37(1):15-37 Hood, C. 2011. The Blame Game. Princeton. Princeton University Press * Lindblom, C. 1958. The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19: pp.78-88 * Pickering, A and Cowley, S (2010) \u2018Risk Matrices: implied accuracy and false assumptions\u2019, 2(1) Journal of Health & Safety Research & Practice Thompson, M. and Warburton, M. 1985. \u2018Decision making under contradictory certainties: how to save the Himalayas when you can\u2019t find out what\u2019s wrong with them\u2019 Journal of Applied Systems Analysis. Vol.12. Ward, S (2003) Approaches to Integrated Risk Management: A Multi-dimensional Framework. Risk Management: An International Journal 5 (4) 7-23 Wildavsky, A. (1988) Searching for Safety. Ch.4 \u2018Anticipation vs Resilience\u2019. New Brunswick: Transaction Books. Minimum Reading Meyer, J and Rowan, B (1977) \u2018Institutionalized organizations:formal structure as myth and ceremony\u2019. American Journal of Sociology 83\/2: 340\u2013363. Clarke, L (2001) Mission Improbable: Using Fantasy Documents to Tame Disaster. The University of Chicago Press. Ch\u2019s 1 and 6 Huber, M. and Rothstein, H. (2013) \u2018The Risk Organisation: Or how organisations reconcile themselves to failure\u2019. Journal of Risk Research, 16 (6): 651-675 Additional Reading Arena, M., M. Arnaboldi, and G. Azzone. 2010. The organizational dynamics of enterprise risk management. Accounting, Organization and Society 35, no. 2010: 659\u201375. Clarke, L. (1990) Oil-Spill Fantasies. The Atlantic Monthly. November 1990:65-77 Clarke, L. and Perrow, C. 1996. \u2018Prosaic organisational Failure\u2019 American Behavioural Scientist, 39 (8), pp.1040-56 Clarke, L. (2004) \u2018What\u2019s the Plan?\u2019 Harvard Business Review. June 2004 DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983) \u2018The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields\u2019 American Sociological Review 48(2):147-60 Feldman, M. and March, J. 1981. \u2018Information in Organisations as Signal and Symbol\u2019. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (2) 171-186 Financial Reporting Council (FRC) (2014) Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting, London: FRC. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) (1999) Internal Control: Guidance for directors on the combined code, London: The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. (2005 revisions here) * Power, M. (1997) The Audit Society, Oxford University Press: Oxford. Power, M. 2004. The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty. DEMOS: London Power, M. (2005) \u2018Organizational Responses to Risk: The rise of the chief risk officer\u2019 in Hutter, B. and Power, M Eds (2005) Organizational Encounters with Risk. Cambridge: CUP (available online through KCL library) * Power, M. (2007) Organised Uncertainty. Oxford: OUP (available online through KCL library). Power, M. 2009. The risk management of nothing. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (6- 7): 849\u2013855.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Drawing on the literatures discussed in one of more of the Lectures in Part 1 of the module I put all the literatures review down here: Additional Reading Downer J. (2007) When the Chick Hits the Fan: Representativeness and Reproducibility in Technological Tests. Social Studies of Science. 37(1):7-26. doi:10.1177\/0306312706064235 Hopkins, A. 1999. The Limits of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[9],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/42718"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42718"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/42718\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42718"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=42718"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=42718"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=42718"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}