{"id":42494,"date":"2025-04-14T21:30:34","date_gmt":"2025-04-14T21:30:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/what-is-the-efficacy-of-specific-plant-extracts-or-compounds-against-pathogens-bacteria-fungi-viruses-causing-infections\/"},"modified":"2025-04-14T21:30:34","modified_gmt":"2025-04-14T21:30:34","slug":"what-is-the-efficacy-of-specific-plant-extracts-or-compounds-against-pathogens-bacteria-fungi-viruses-causing-infections","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/what-is-the-efficacy-of-specific-plant-extracts-or-compounds-against-pathogens-bacteria-fungi-viruses-causing-infections\/","title":{"rendered":"What is the efficacy of specific plant extracts or compounds against pathogens (bacteria, fungi, viruses) causing infections?"},"content":{"rendered":"

PAPER RUBRIC (50 points)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction <\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00b7 Contains all of the pertinent background information for the reader to understand the experiment and is communicated in a logical order. NO direct quotations. 10 points<\/p>\n

\u00b7 Some information is missing and the information is convoluted: 5 point<\/p>\n

\u00b7 Insufficient information has been included and is not communicated in a way that can be understood: 0 points<\/p>\n

Methods<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00b7 All parts of the methods section are covered in the paper and are well thought out. Methods is an analysis summation and not just a copy\/paste of what they are saying. NO direct quotations. 10 points<\/p>\n

\u00b7 The methods are missing critical information, are overly generic, or are missing important pieces. 5 points<\/p>\n

\u00b7 Not enough information is provided, the information is confusing, or the methods are listed in bullet points: 0 points.<\/p>\n

Results<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00b7 Results from the three papers are well summarized and common themes are discussed with findings. Any inconsistencies\/differences are highlighted between research articles. Results section is not just a copy and paste of findings from the other papers. NO direct quotations. 10 points.<\/p>\n

\u00b7 Portions of the results section need additional work or are not clearly written. If graphical figure is included it is not well explained\/captioned. 5 points.<\/p>\n

\u00b7 Results are only presented in the graph and a paragraph describing the results is missing: 0 points.<\/p>\n

Discussion <\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00b7 Clearly outlines the final out comes of the paper, comparing and contrasting findings and identifying areas of needed growth\/inconsistences. Paper expresses what further needs of research are needed to make a more complete study (experiments suggested and supported with reasoning) and does not just say further research is needed. Author\u2019s own input can be put into this section. 10 points<\/p>\n

\u00b7 Discussion follows most of the guidelines up top but section needs some improvements. 5 points.<\/p>\n

\u00b7 Discussion is convoluted or hard to understand. Missing significant work. 0 points.<\/p>\n

Literature Cited<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00b7 All information that is not common knowledge has an in-text citation and the articles cited in the lab report are listed at the end of the report. All of the citations listed at the end of the report are cited in the text of the lab report itself. At least 3 relevant references are cited. All citations are from peer reviewed sources. Both in text citations and the literature cited list follow APA formatting. All information in the report has been paraphrased into student\u2019s own words. 5 points.<\/p>\n

\u00b7 Appropriate citations are provided, but are not properly formatted: 2.5 points.<\/p>\n

\u00b7 In text citations or the list of literature cited are missing: 0 points. <\/p>\n

Presentation<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00b7 Clearly written, no grammar errors, neat and well thought out, follows scientific formal lab report guidelines, and shows a thorough understanding of the experiment: 5 points<\/p>\n

\u00b7 Clearly written, but grammar errors are present: 2.5 points<\/p>\n

\u00b7 Hard to understand: 0 points<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

PAPER RUBRIC (50 points) Introduction \u00b7 Contains all of the pertinent background information for the reader to understand the experiment and is communicated in a logical order. NO direct quotations. 10 points \u00b7 Some information is missing and the information is convoluted: 5 point \u00b7 Insufficient information has been included and is not communicated in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[124],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/42494"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42494"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/42494\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42494"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=42494"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=42494"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=42494"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}