{"id":42304,"date":"2025-03-03T01:39:36","date_gmt":"2025-03-03T01:39:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/the-impact-of-domestic-violence-on-emotional-contagion-do-children-mirror-their-mothers-emotional-responses\/"},"modified":"2025-03-03T01:39:36","modified_gmt":"2025-03-03T01:39:36","slug":"the-impact-of-domestic-violence-on-emotional-contagion-do-children-mirror-their-mothers-emotional-responses","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/the-impact-of-domestic-violence-on-emotional-contagion-do-children-mirror-their-mothers-emotional-responses\/","title":{"rendered":"The Impact of Domestic Violence on Emotional Contagion: Do Children Mirror Their Mothers&#8217; Emotional Responses?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>ABSTRACT <br \/>Your abstract should be a brief, comprehensive summary of your paper. It should concisely<br \/>describe the following: the research problem, the participants, the procedure, the major finding,<br \/>and the conclusions and implications, all in less than 250 words. The abstract is on its own page,<br \/>following the title page.<br \/>INTRODUCTION Page guideline: 5-8 pages<br \/>Your introduction must provide a cohesive story (or argument) that leads the reader to naturally<br \/>wonder about the question you are addressing in your current study. In other words, the aim of<br \/>the study should naturally follow the arguments you make and the research you review in the<br \/>introduction. Each sentence of your paper must naturally flow from the one prior to it, and each<br \/>idea in your paper must naturally flow from the previous idea stated in your paper. This flow<br \/>can rarely happen when you quote extensively, so as a general rule, scientific writing does not<br \/>rely on quoted material. Only quote someone else\u2019s work when it cannot be summarized or<br \/>paraphrased. Otherwise, avoid quotes. What is the major issue being investigated? Why is the problem interesting\u00b7 What is the theoretical background for your study? That is, what has previous researchabout this topic shown, and what possible explanations can be found in the literature that<br \/>might help you predict what the outcome will be? Make sure the articles you cite are<br \/>relevant to the study at hand.<br \/>\u00b7 As you describe prior work, describe the limitations of this previous work (that make<br \/>further work necessary). For example, \u201cAlthough these prior studies provide important<br \/>information about ABC, they have not directly studied XYZ.\u201d<br \/>\u00b7 Present an overview of the current study. What knowledge can be gained from the<br \/>current work? What is the major question (restated)?<br \/>\u00b7 Briefly describe how this knowledge will be gained by providing a brief overview of how<br \/>you\u2019ll address the research questions \u2013 do not detail all of your methods.<br \/>\u00b7 End by listing your specific hypotheses.<br \/>METHOD Page guideline: As needed, so that someone could replicate the study<br \/>Because this is a proposal, the method section should be written in future tense (note that when<br \/>you write up the study for publication, the methods are changed to past tense). The following<br \/>subsections are merely an example of how to structure the methods section. The subsections in<br \/>your paper may differ depending on the exact nature of the study you are proposing.<br \/>Subjects\/Participants. 5 points<br \/>Explain both the demographic information (intended total number of participants, targeted age<br \/>range, targeted gender breakdown, other relevant descriptions of your proposed sample) and the<br \/>method of selection (how will you recruit and select participants, how will you assess for the<br \/>presence or absence of the disorder(s) you are testing, what are your inclusion and exclusion<br \/>criteria for the study, how will subjects be assigned to conditions if there are multiple conditions,<br \/>etc.). If you have some small-scale pilot data that you have collected for this study, please<br \/>include the means and standard deviations for your demographic and clinical data. Otherwise, do<br \/>not include that information if you do not have any data collected.<br \/>Design. 3 points<br \/>Clearly specify independent and dependent variables. If your IVs and DVs are not clear (or<br \/>are incorrect), you will lose these 3 points.<br \/>For each independent variable:<br \/>\u00b7 How many levels were included? What were the levels (unless it&#8217;s obvious, e.g., the two<br \/>levels of gender)?<br \/>\u00b7 Was each variable manipulated independent or a repeated measure?<br \/>\u00b7 If you have a factorial design, describe the design.<br \/>For example, \u201cThe study utilized a 3 (Task Condition) x 2 (Diagnostic Status) mixed<br \/>design, with diagnostic status as a between-subjects factor, and Task Condition as a<br \/>repeated measures within-subjects factor. . .\u201d<br \/>For each dependent variable:<br \/>\u00b7 How was it measured?Materials. <br \/>\u00b7 Describe any materials used, including psychological screeners or measures.<br \/>How were they constructed? How were they used in the experiment?<br \/>\u00b7 Samples of stimuli (or questionnaire items) should be included. These examples may be<br \/>presented in a table, if appropriate. Complete lists of stimuli (or complete forms of<br \/>questionnaires) can be included in an Appendix.<br \/><strong>Procedure<\/strong>. <br \/>Summarize each step in the data gathering procedure. Be sure to include:<br \/>\u00b7 Complete instructions to participants (verbatim or paraphrased)<br \/>\u00b7 Formation of experimental groups<br \/>\u00b7 Specific experimental manipulations<br \/>\u00b7 Any control features of the design: randomization, counterbalancing<br \/>Brief Description of Data Analysis.<br \/>How were the raw data converted for analyses (e.g., scores, proportions, etc.)? What computer<br \/>programs were used in the data analysis? If data coding procedures were used, explain the<br \/>coding scheme. If you are proposing the collection of data requiring advanced computing<br \/>analysis (such as brain imaging data), please describe the procedures for analyzing the data.<br \/>DATA ANALYSIS PLAN WITH PREDICTED RESULTS (12 points) Page guideline: As<br \/>needed<br \/>Present the predicted findings as if you were telling a story. If you are proposing a pre-post<br \/>clinical trial design with 2 or more groups, you MUST indicate the anticipated results (within-<br \/>groups, between-groups, interaction) from a 2-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA, if<br \/>appropriate. Each of these three statements is worth one point (so 3 points total).<br \/>\u00b7 State the hypothesis or question in conceptual terms. For example, \u201cOur first hypothesis<br \/>suggests that it is easier to withhold button press responses for sad faces compared with<br \/>happy faces or neutral faces.\u201d<br \/>\u00b7 State the hypothesis or question in operational terms. For example, \u201cTo address this<br \/>hypothesis, we will use a one-way repeated measures ANOVA to examine accuracy for<br \/>the inhibition of button-press responses for the three different emotional expressions. We<br \/>will use p&lt;.05 as the threshold for statistical significance.\u201d<br \/>\u00b7 Give the predicted answer. For example, \u201cWe predict that the ANOVA will show<br \/>significant differences in the inhibition accuracy for the different emotional facial<br \/>expressions.\u201d<br \/>\u00b7 Support the answer with additional comparisons, such as post-hoc pairwise tests. For<br \/>example, \u201cTo determine the nature of the accuracy differences between emotions, we will<br \/>use post-hoc paired samples t-tests with p&lt;.05 as the significance threshold for each<br \/>pairwise comparison. We expect to see that accuracy for happy faces is greater than<br \/>accuracy for either fear faces or sad faces.\u201d<br \/>\u00b7 Elaborate or qualify the overall conclusion, if appropriate. For example, \u201cWe predict that<br \/>accuracy will be higher for sad faces compared with happy faces, but the comparison of<br \/>sad faces to neutral faces will not reach statistical significance, nor will the comparison of<br \/>happy faces to neutral faces.\u201d13<br \/>\u00b7 Summarize where things stand: \u201cThus, it appears as if it is easier to withhold responses to<br \/>sad faces compared with happy faces, but not easier to withhold responses to either sad<br \/>faces or happy faces compared with neutral faces.\u201d<br \/>\u00b7 Lead into the next section with a transition sentence. For example, \u201cWe predict that the<br \/>neuroimaging data will reveal an interesting pattern that should coincide with the<br \/>behavioral performance results. Specifically, comparisons of the three different emotion<br \/>conditions will show that there is increased activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex<br \/>for the inhibition to sad faces condition compared with the inhibition for happy faces<br \/>condition.\u201d<br \/>Tables and Figures (only if needed for your paper. Otherwise, you can skip).<br \/>\u00b7 Include tables and figures in your paper, as appropriate. Use a figure when findings<br \/>cannot be simply stated in a few numbers, and to show examples of the cognitive or<br \/>behavioral task used in your study design.<br \/>\u00b7 If using a graph, label both the independent and dependent measures clearly and<br \/>completely on the axes, and put values on the axes.<br \/>\u00b7 Include a figure caption to explain in a sentence or two what is depicted in the figure.<br \/>\u00b7 In the text, refer to the table or figure at the appropriate point, and guide the reader<br \/>through the figure.<br \/>DISCUSSION Page guideline: 3-5 pages<br \/>\u00b7 Recap in plain English (but don&#8217;t repeat) your anticipated results. Do not include p-<br \/>values or talk about significance levels.<br \/>\u00b7 Do your results support your hypotheses? Present clear statements of support or non-<br \/>support.<br \/>\u00b7 Don\u2019t just restate the predicted findings \u2013 think critically about the findings and draw<br \/>your own conclusions about what they tell us about how people behave in specific<br \/>situations<br \/>\u00b7 What inferences or implications can be drawn from the findings? What are the study\u2019s<br \/>theoretical implications and significance? Practical implications and significance?<br \/>\u00b7 How do your results relate to those of other investigators?<br \/>\u00b7 What are the specific strengths of your study design? For example, does your study<br \/>include a large, well-constructed sample or perhaps the introduction of a specific control<br \/>condition that had not been used in prior work?<br \/>\u00b7 What are the shortcomings\/limitations of your study? Is there something that makes it<br \/>difficult to generalize your results to the complete population you wish to study?<br \/>\u00b7 What questions remain unanswered? What are some future directions for research on this<br \/>topic?<br \/>\u00b7 Why does your study make an important contribution? Make a concluding statement.<br \/>REFERENCES <br \/>Use APA format (you do not need to include the doi). Make sure all citations in the text are in<br \/>the References section and vice versa. References should be high quality, peer-reviewed<br \/>published papers or professional books (e.g., no websites or Dissertation Abstracts<br \/>International). References can include papers describing the results of individual studies or<br \/>projects, and papers that review and summarize the current state of the literature on your topic14<br \/>and\/or put forward new theories or viewpoints. Other acceptable references include chapters of<br \/>professionally edited handbooks or reference books (e.g., the Cambridge Handbook of<br \/>Psychology, Health, and Medicine), or books authored by professors that are geared toward<br \/>professionals or an informed general audience (e.g., Joseph LeDoux\u2019s Anxious). Self-help<br \/>books or websites are not acceptable sources of information. If it is unclear to you whether a<br \/>particular source of information is acceptable<br \/>18 articles: it has to be peer-reviewed and academically reviewed<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ABSTRACT Your abstract should be a brief, comprehensive summary of your paper. It should conciselydescribe the following: the research problem, the participants, the procedure, the major finding,and the conclusions and implications, all in less than 250 words. The abstract is on its own page,following the title page.INTRODUCTION Page guideline: 5-8 pagesYour introduction must provide a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[7],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/42304"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42304"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/42304\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42304"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=42304"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=42304"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=42304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}