Write your five-paragraph Persuasive Essay on the Operation Geronimo Case Study. Use your time to develop a deep understanding of<\/p>\n
your topic to fully explain your stance on the topic. Choose from either one of the two sides to persuade the reader. (The persuasive essay is<\/p>\n
assessed within the following areas and weighted as shown below: Introduction; Body Content; Organization, Structure, and Transition;<\/p>\n
Evidence Supporting Discussion (reference source); Grammar, Spelling, and Style; Conclusion; and current APA. Ensure you use Times<\/p>\n
New Roman, 12pt font, double spaced, in MS Word format, using the current (APA 7 style), STUDENT PAPER, NO RUNNING HEADS,<\/p>\n
NO ABSTRACT. Your essay should include four major sections: NO Title Page, ( Highlight the thesis) Thesis Statement, Main Body, and on the end of the 4th page( References Page). Provide a<\/p>\n
minimum of three credible government references for your reference page.<\/p>\n
Rubics:<\/p>\n
, Strong<\/p>\n
introduction of topic clearly<\/p>\n
delineates subtopics to be reviewed.<\/p>\n
Fully supports thesis statement.<\/p>\n
Far Exceeded Standard<\/p>\n
40<\/p>\n
, solidly<\/p>\n
introduced all aspects of the topic.<\/p>\n
Fully linked the topic to the<\/p>\n
overarching theme Analysis<\/p>\n
connects evidence to clearly<\/p>\n
support the issue. Main points well<\/p>\n
developed with high quality and<\/p>\n
quantity support. Reveals high<\/p>\n
degree of critical and creative<\/p>\n
thinking. The body meets 4-5 page<\/p>\n
requirement.<\/p>\n
headings<\/p>\n
contain the key point of subsequent<\/p>\n
material. Strong organization and<\/p>\n
integration of material within<\/p>\n
subtopics. Strong transitions that<\/p>\n
are clear and smoothly link<\/p>\n
subtopics, and main topic.<\/p>\n
The paper Exceeds Standard plus,<\/p>\n
the paper cited four or more relevant<\/p>\n
sources of which at least one will be<\/p>\n
an Army professional journal (any<\/p>\n
branch, Army University Press, or<\/p>\n
War College Press). Source material<\/p>\n
clearly supported the subtopic, main<\/p>\n
topic by providing pertinent evidence.<\/p>\n
01 <\/p>\n
The link you can start with is:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/olc\/opinions\/2001\/09\/31\/op-olc-v025-p0188_0.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n https:\/\/harvardnsj.org\/2011\/05\/16\/the-legality-of-killing-osama-bin-laden\/<\/a><\/p>\n