{"id":38492,"date":"2024-11-22T01:45:07","date_gmt":"2024-11-22T01:45:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/the-ethical-justification-for-banning-fur-clothing-balancing-animal-welfare-and-sustainable-fashion\/"},"modified":"2024-11-22T01:45:07","modified_gmt":"2024-11-22T01:45:07","slug":"the-ethical-justification-for-banning-fur-clothing-balancing-animal-welfare-and-sustainable-fashion","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/the-ethical-justification-for-banning-fur-clothing-balancing-animal-welfare-and-sustainable-fashion\/","title":{"rendered":"The Ethical Justification for Banning Fur Clothing: Balancing Animal Welfare and Sustainable Fashion"},"content":{"rendered":"

Assignment Instructions<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Paper Overview<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Your task is to write a philosophical prescriptive essay in which you develop clear, concise, and well-reasoned premises to support and defend an original, narrow, substantive philosophical argument on the prescriptive argument you have chosen and I have approved for this assignment.<\/span><\/p>\n

The point of this paper is for <\/span>you<\/span> <\/span>to do substantial critical thinking yourself, not for you to just write a report on other’s research or opinions. <\/span><\/strong><\/span>Yet, your argument needs to engage significantly with scholarly literature. So, it is important to provide your reader with a sufficient amount of information to understand your argument and to demonstrate why it is reasonable for them to believe your Conclusion.  This involves careful, clear, and concise summaries of views where needed <\/span>and<\/span> <\/span>clear analysis of key aspects of research  <\/span>Include information\/explication only as it is necessary for understanding, motivating, supporting, or defending your argument<\/span>. If the information does not directly support your argument, unless it is part of your counterargument, it does not belong in your paper. <\/span><\/p>\n

Critical Thinking.<\/strong><\/span> <\/span>You need to be able to explain clearly and concisely why the reader should believe your argument.  This is your purpose throughout the paper.  So, when you present research information, why should I believe that information makes your premise stronger?   And when you present research analysis, why should I believe that analysis makes your premise stronger?  Just providing research and doing an analysis does not necessarily make your premise stronger.  It is how you present and explain this information to the reader that defines your critical thinking ability.  <\/span><\/p>\n

Counterarguments and Refutations.<\/strong><\/span> <\/span>In terms of considering counterarguments to your view, try to tackle just one of the strongest objections to your position that an opponent might raise. Any objection you consider should bear upon your argument. That is, it shouldn’t be a flat rejection of your argument. Also, this portion should be no longer than 1 page of your paper maximum.<\/span><\/p>\n

MLA (Modern Language Association) Format.<\/strong><\/span>  I am going to focus on MLA 9th edition format <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Philosophy Structure.<\/span><\/strong>  To be clear, this includes:<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n