Literature\/Narrative reviews:
\nbetween 3000 and 4000 words, no more than 70 references, and an abstract within 250 words
\n Literature\/Narrative reviews: Abstract (including subject or procedure reviewed);
\nMethod (strategy for
\nreview including databases selected);
\nResults and Discussion (findings from an analysis of the literature);
\nand Conclusion (what the authors have derived from the analysis).<\/p>\n
Literature\/Narrative reviews provide a comprehensive, explorative summary and critique
\nof published work in order to answer a broad question that may be more generally stated.
\nSuch reviews should be organized in a logical manner and include the following components:
\nIntroduction that provides a concise background and rationale for the inquiry. It should also
\ninclude the purpose of the inquiry and its relevance to practice and\/or the profession; Methods
\nthat clearly describe the search strategies used; databases accessed; and the keywords selected
\nfor searches. Inclusion and exclusion criteria must be documented when applicable; Results and
\nDiscussion that present findings from the literature; review, compare, and contrast them, and
\ninclude a discussion of possible explanations for differences within the findings; Conclusion that
\nsummarizes the findings and their implications for practice and the profession. The conclusion must
\nbe supported by the literature analysed. Tables, illustrations, and photographs are encouraged.
\n REFERENCE STYLE
\nCJDH, like most biomedical and scientific journals, uses the Vancouver citation style for references,
\nwhich was established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors in 1978. The Vancouver
\nstyle requires that references be numbered consecutively in the order in which they are first mentioned
\nin the text. Use the previously assigned number for subsequent references to a citation (i.e., no \u201cop cit\u201d or
\n\u201cibid\u201d). Use superscript Arabic numerals to identify the reference within the text (e.g.,1,2 or 3\u20136). <\/p>\n
5-7 references prefered, or more.. all original pdf parer please attach here or link<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Literature\/Narrative reviews: between 3000 and 4000 words, no more than 70 references, and an abstract within 250 words Literature\/Narrative reviews: Abstract (including subject or procedure reviewed); Method (strategy for review including databases selected); Results and Discussion (findings from an analysis of the literature); and Conclusion (what the authors have derived from the analysis). Literature\/Narrative reviews […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[131],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/35535"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35535"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/35535\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35535"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=35535"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=35535"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=35535"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}