{"id":33186,"date":"2024-09-23T01:49:23","date_gmt":"2024-09-23T01:49:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/focused-soap-note-for-schizophrenia-spectrum-and-other-psychotic-medication-induced-movement-disorders\/"},"modified":"2024-09-23T01:49:23","modified_gmt":"2024-09-23T01:49:23","slug":"focused-soap-note-for-schizophrenia-spectrum-and-other-psychotic-medication-induced-movement-disorders","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/focused-soap-note-for-schizophrenia-spectrum-and-other-psychotic-medication-induced-movement-disorders\/","title":{"rendered":"Focused SOAP note for Schizophrenia Spectrum and other psychotic medication induced movement disorders"},"content":{"rendered":"
Video Transcript- <\/div>\n

DR. MOORE: Good afternoon. I’m Dr. Moore. Want to thank you for coming
\nin for your appointment today. I’m going to be asking you some
\nquestions about your history and some symptoms. And to get started,
\nI just want to ensure I have the right
\npatient and chart. So can you tell me your
\nname and your date of birth? <\/p>\n

SHERMAN TREMAINE:
\nI’m Sherman Tremaine, and Tremaine is my game game. My birthday is November 3, 1968. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: Great. And can you tell
\nme today’s date? Like the day of the week,
\nand where we are today? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: Use any recent
\ndate, and any location is OK. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: OK, Sherman. What about do you know
\nwhat month this is? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: It’s March 18. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: And the
\nday of the week? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: Oh, it’s a
\nWednesday or maybe a Thursday. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: OK. And where are we today? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE:
\nI believe we’re in your office, Dr. Moore. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: OK, great. So tell me a little bit about
\nwhat brings you in today. What brings you here? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: Well,
\nmy sister made me come in. I was living with my
\nmom, and she died. I was living, and not bothering
\nanyone, and those people– those people, they just
\nwon’t leave me alone. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: What people? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: The ones
\noutside my window watching. They watch me. I can hear them, and
\nI see their shadows. They think I don’t
\nsee them, but I do. The government sent
\nthem to watch me, so my taxes are high,
\nso high in the sky. Do you see that bird? <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: Sherman,
\nhow long have you saw or heard these people? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: Oh, for weeks,
\nweeks and weeks and weeks. Hear that– hear that
\nheavy metal music? They want you to think
\nit’s weak, but it’s heavy. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: No, Sherman. I don’t see any birds
\nor hear any music. Do you sleep well, Sherman? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: I try to
\nbut the voices are loud. They keep me up
\nfor days and days. I try to watch TV, but they
\nwatch me through the screen, and they come in
\nand poison my food. I tricked them though. I tricked them. I locked everything
\nup in the fridge. They aren’t getting in there. Can I smoke? <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: No, Sherman. There is no smoking here. How much do you usually smoke? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: Well,
\nI smoke all day, all day. Three packs a day. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: Three packs a day. OK. What about alcohol? When was your last drink? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: Oh, yesterday. My sister buys me a 12-pack,
\nand tells me to make it last until next week’s grocery run. I don’t go to the grocery store. They play too loud of
\nthe heavy metal music. They also follow me there. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: What about marijuana? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: Yes,
\nbut not since my mom died three years ago. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: Use any cocaine? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: No,
\nno, no, no, no, no, no. No drugs ever, clever, ever. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: What about
\nany blackouts or seizures or see or hear things
\nfrom drugs or alcohol? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: No, no, never
\na clever [INAUDIBLE] ever. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: What about
\nany DUIs or legal issues from drugs or alcohol? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE:
\nNever clever’s ever. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: OK. What about any medication
\nfor your mental health? Have you tried those before, and
\nwhat was your reaction to them? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: I hate
\nHaldol and Thorazine. No, no, I’m not
\ngoing to take it. Risperidone gave me boobs. No, I’m not going to take it. Seroquel, that is OK. But they’re all poison,
\nnope, not going to take it. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: OK. So tell me, any
\nblood relatives have any mental health or
\nsubstance abuse issues? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE:
\nThey say that my dad was crazy with
\nparanoid schizophrenia. He did in the old
\nstate hospital. They gave him his beer there. Can you believe that? Not like them today. My mom had anxiety. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: Did any blood
\nrelatives commit suicide? S<\/div>\n
HERMAN TREMAINE:
\nOh, no demons there. No, no. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: What about you? Have you ever done anything
\nlike cut yourself, or had any thoughts about killing
\nyourself or anyone else? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE:
\nI already told you. No demons there. Have been in the hospital three
\ntimes though when I was 20. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: OK. What about any medical issues? Do you have any
\nmedical problems? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: Ooh, I
\ntake metformin for diabetes. Had or I have a fatty
\nliver, they say, but they never saw it. So I don’t know unless
\nthe aliens told them. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: OK. So who raised you? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: My
\nmom and my sister. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: And who
\ndo you live with now? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE:
\nMyself, but my sister’s plotting with the
\ngovernment to change that. They tapped my phone. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: OK. Have you ever been married? Are you single,
\nwidowed, or divorced? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: I’ve
\nnever been married. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: Do you
\nhave any children? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: No. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: OK. What is your highest
\nlevel of education? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: I
\nwent to the 10th grade. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: And what do
\nyou like to do for fun? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: I don’t work,
\nso smoking and drinking pop. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: OK. Have you ever been arrested or
\nconvicted for anything legally? <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: No, but
\nthey have told me they would. They have told me they would
\nif I didn’t stop calling 911 about the people outside. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: OK. What about any kind of trauma
\nas a child or an adult? Like physical, sexual,
\nemotional abuse. <\/div>\n
SHERMAN TREMAINE: My dad was
\nrough on us until he died. <\/div>\n
DR. MOORE: OK. [MUSIC PLAYING] So thank you for answering
\nthose questions for me. Now, let’s talk about
\nhow I can best help you. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n

To Prepare<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n


<\/p>\n

\n
    \n
  • Review the Focused SOAP Note template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. There is also a Focused SOAP Note Exemplar provided as a guide for Assignment expectations.<\/li>\n
  • Review the video, Case Study: Sherman Tremaine<\/i>. You will use this case as the basis of this Assignment. In this video, a Walden faculty member is assessing a mock patient. The patient will be represented onscreen as an avatar.<\/li>\n
  • Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient.<\/li>\n
  • Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient.
    <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
    \n
    \n

    The Assignment<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
    \n

    Develop a focused SOAP note, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate a primary diagnosis. Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Subjective: <\/strong>What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life? <\/li>\n
    • Objective: <\/strong>What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?\u202f <\/li>\n
    • Assessment:<\/strong> Discuss the patient\u2019s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, and list them in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the <\/span>DSM-5-TR<\/i> diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what <\/span>DSM-5-TR<\/i> criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.<\/li>\n
    • Plan:<\/strong> What is your plan for psychotherapy? What is your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies? Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters, as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan. Also incorporate one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.<\/li>\n
    • Reflection notes:<\/strong> What would you do differently with this patient if you could conduct the session again? Discuss what your next intervention would be if you were able to follow up with this patient.\u202fAlso include in your reflection a discussion related to legal\/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion, and disease prevention, taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).<\/li>\n
    • Provide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
      \n
      \n
      NRNP_6675_Week5_Assignment_Rubric<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n
      \n
      NRNP_6675_Week5_Assignment_Rubric<\/span><\/div>\n<\/caption>\n
      Criteria<\/th>\nRatings<\/th>\nPts<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
      \n
      \n
      This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>Create documentation in the Focused SOAP Note Template about your assigned patient.In the Subjective section, provide: \u2022 Chief complaint\u2022 History of present illness (HPI)\u2022 Past psychiatric history\u2022 Medication trials and current medications\u2022 Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis\u2022 Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric\/substance use, social, and medical history\u2022 Allergies\u2022 ROS<\/span><\/p>\n
      <\/div>\n
      <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n\n\n\n\n
      \n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      15<\/span> <\/span>to >13.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Excellent 90%\u2013100%<\/div>\n
      The response throughly and accurately describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      13<\/span> <\/span>to >11.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Good 80%\u201389%<\/div>\n
      The response accurately describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      11<\/span> <\/span>to >10.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Fair 70%\u201379%<\/div>\n
      The response describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis but is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      10<\/span> <\/span>to >0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Poor 0%\u201369%<\/div>\n
      The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or the subjective documentation is missing.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      15<\/span> <\/span>pts
      <\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      \n
      \n
      This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>In the Objective section, provide:\u2022 Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history\u2022 Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses<\/span><\/p>\n
      <\/div>\n
      <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n\n\n\n\n
      \n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      15<\/span> <\/span>to >13.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Excellent 90%\u2013100%<\/div>\n
      The response thoroughly and accurately documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are thoroughly and accurately documented.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      13<\/span> <\/span>to >11.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Good 80%\u201389%<\/div>\n
      The response accurately documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are accurately documented.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      11<\/span> <\/span>to >10.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Fair 70%\u201379%<\/div>\n
      Documentation of the patient’s physical exam is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain minor innacuracies.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      10<\/span> <\/span>to >0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Poor 0%\u201369%<\/div>\n
      The response provides incomplete or inaccurate documentation of the patient’s physical exam. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed. Or the objective documentation is missing.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      15<\/span> <\/span>pts
      <\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      \n
      \n
      This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>In the Assessment section, provide:\u2022 Results of the mental status examination, presented in paragraph form\u2022 At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.<\/span><\/p>\n
      <\/div>\n
      <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n\n\n\n\n
      \n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      20<\/span> <\/span>to >17.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Excellent 90%\u2013100%<\/div>\n
      The response thoroughly and accurately documents the results of the mental status exam…. Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justification for each of the disorders selected.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      17<\/span> <\/span>to >15.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Good 80%\u201389%<\/div>\n
      The response accurately documents the results of the mental status exam…. Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides an accurate justification for each of the disorders selected.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      15<\/span> <\/span>to >13.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Fair 70%\u201379%<\/div>\n
      The response documents the results of the mental status exam with some vagueness or innacuracy…. Response lists at least three different possible disorders for a differential diagnosis of the patient and provides a justification for each, but may contain some vagueness or innacuracy.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      13<\/span> <\/span>to >0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Poor 0%\u201369%<\/div>\n
      The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the results of the mental status exam and explanation of the differential diagnoses. Or the assessment documentation is missing.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      20<\/span> <\/span>pts
      <\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      \n
      \n
      This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>In the Plan section, provide:\u2022 Your plan for psychotherapy\u2022 Your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies. Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan. \u2022 Incorporate one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.<\/span><\/p>\n
      <\/div>\n
      <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n\n\n\n\n
      \n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      25<\/span> <\/span>to >22.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Excellent 90%\u2013100%<\/div>\n
      The response provides an evidence-based, detailed, and appropriate plan for psychotherapy for the patient…. The response provides an evidence-based, detailed, and appropriate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. A strong rationale for the plan is provided that demonstrates critical thinking and content understanding…. The response includes at least one evidence-based health promotion activity and one evidence-based patient education strategy.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      22<\/span> <\/span>to >19.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Good 80%\u201389%<\/div>\n
      The response provides an evidence-based and appropriate plan for psychotherapy for the patient…. The response provides an evidence-based and appropriate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. An adequate rationale for the plan is provided…. The response includes at least one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      19<\/span> <\/span>to >17.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Fair 70%\u201379%<\/div>\n
      The response provides a somewhat vague or inaccurate plan for psychotherapy for the patient…. The response provides a somewhat vague or inaccurate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. The rationale for the plan is weak or general…. The response includes one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy, but it may contain some vagueness or innacuracy.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      17<\/span> <\/span>to >0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Poor 0%\u201369%<\/div>\n
      The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate plan for psychotherapy for the patient…. The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. The rationale for the plan is inaccurate or missing…. The health promotion and patient education strategies are incomplete or missing.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      25<\/span> <\/span>pts
      <\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      \n
      \n
      This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>\u2022 Discussion include what may be done differently with this patient if student conducted the session again. Discussed the next intervention if you could follow up with this patient. The discussion was related to legal\/ethical considerations (demonstrated critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), social determinates of health, health promotion, and disease prevention that take into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).<\/span><\/p>\n
      <\/div>\n
      <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n\n\n\n\n
      \n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      5<\/span> <\/span>to >4.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Excellent 90%\u2013100%<\/div>\n
      Reflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking. Reflections contain a discussion of all elements described within assignment directions.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      4<\/span> <\/span>to >3.5<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Good 80%\u201389%<\/div>\n
      Reflections demonstrate critical thinking. Reflections contain 2 out of 3 (legal\/ethical considerations, social determinate of health, health promotion) with consideration of patient factors and risk factors.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      3.5<\/span> <\/span>to >3.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Fair 70%\u201379%<\/div>\n
      Reflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking. Reflections contain 2 out of 3 (legal\/ethical considerations, social determinate of health, health promotion) without consideration of patient factors and risk factors.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      3<\/span> <\/span>to >0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Poor 0%\u201369%<\/div>\n
      Reflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      5<\/span> <\/span>pts
      <\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      \n
      \n
      This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>Provide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old).<\/span><\/p>\n
      <\/div>\n
      <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n\n\n\n\n
      \n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      10<\/span> <\/span>to >8.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Excellent 90%\u2013100%<\/div>\n
      The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study. The resources reflect the latest clinical guidelines and provide strong justification for decision making.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      8<\/span> <\/span>to >7.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Good 80%\u201389%<\/div>\n
      The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature that appropriately support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      7<\/span> <\/span>to >6.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Fair 70%\u201379%<\/div>\n
      Three evidence-based resources are provided to support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, but they may only provide vague or weak justification.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      6<\/span> <\/span>to >0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Poor 0%\u201369%<\/div>\n
      Two or fewer resources are provided to support the assessment and diagnosis decisions. The resources may not be current or evidence based.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      10<\/span> <\/span>pts
      <\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      \n
      \n
      This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for parenthetical\/in-text citations and reference list.<\/span><\/p>\n
      <\/div>\n
      <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n\n\n\n\n
      \n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      5<\/span> <\/span>to >4.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Excellent 90%\u2013100%<\/div>\n
      Uses correct APA format with no errors<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      4<\/span> <\/span>to >3.5<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Good 80%\u201389%<\/div>\n
      Contains 1-2 APA format for parenthetical\/in-text citations and reference list errors<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      3.5<\/span> <\/span>to >3.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Fair 70%\u201379%<\/div>\n
      Contains 3-4 APA format for parenthetical\/in-text citations and reference list errors<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      3<\/span> <\/span>to >0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Poor 0%\u201369%<\/div>\n
      Contains five or more APA format for parenthetical\/in-text citations and reference list errors<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      5<\/span> <\/span>pts
      <\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      \n
      \n
      This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and punctuation<\/span><\/p>\n
      <\/div>\n
      <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n\n\n\n\n
      \n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      5<\/span> <\/span>to >4.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Excellent 90%\u2013100%<\/div>\n
      Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      4<\/span> <\/span>to >3.5<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Good 80%\u201389%<\/div>\n
      Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation format errors<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      3.5<\/span> <\/span>to >3.0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Fair 70%\u201379%<\/div>\n
      Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation format errors<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      \n
      \n
      <\/div>\n

      3<\/span> <\/span>to >0<\/span><\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

      Poor 0%\u201369%<\/div>\n
      Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation format errors that interfere with the reader\u2019s understanding<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
      		\n
      5<\/span> <\/span>pts
      <\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      \n
      Total Points: <\/span>100<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
      <\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      Video Transcript-  DR. MOORE: Good afternoon. I’m Dr. Moore. Want to thank you for coming in for your appointment today. I’m going to be asking you some questions about your history and some symptoms. And to get started, I just want to ensure I have the right patient and chart. So can you tell me […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[60],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/33186"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33186"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/33186\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33186"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=33186"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=33186"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=33186"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}