got the topic from pro cons.org<\/p>\n
Instructions: Submit the Annotated Bibliography rough draft to this assignment link. Although you don’t have to submit the full draft, it should at least contain the scope and 3 of the 5 entries. <\/p>\n
Additional criteria:<\/p>\n
1. MLA style<\/p>\n
2. Times New Roman, size 12 font<\/p>\n
3. Mostly academic sources<\/p>\n
4. A scope, bibliographic info, and an annotation that includes: a summary, degree of advocacy, author’s credibility, publication reliability, and usefulness statement<\/p>\n
5. Upload this same rough draft to the Brainfuse Online Writing Lab for feedback. (I had to this the other day but I didn\u2019t but I\u2019m trying to do the final draft. <\/p>\n
Your Annotated Bibliography should include MLA formatting and documentation and AT LEAST FIVE (5) reputable, academic sources. Each entry in your Annotated Bibliography should do the following:<\/p>\n
Include a correctly formatted MLA reference source citation.
\nInclude an annotation of AT LEAST 200 words that…
\nsummarizes the source
\nevaluates the source.
\nRubric
\nAnnotated Bibliography
\nAnnotated Bibliography
\nCriteria\tRatings\tPts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Complete Bibliographic Information
\n30 pts
\nFull Marks
\nThe bibliographic information is complete and contains no major errors in citations.
\n27 pts
\n90 A
\nThe bibliographic information is complete and contains only 1-2 major errors in citations.
\n24 pts
\n80 B
\nThe bibliographic information is complete contains 3-4 major errors in citations.
\n21 pts
\n70 C
\nThe bibliographic information is mostly complete and contains 4-5 major errors in citations.
\n18 pts
\n60 D
\nThe bibliographic information is somewhat complete and contains 6-8 major errors in citations.
\n15 pts
\n50 F
\nThe bibliographic information is incomplete and has 9 or more major errors in citations.
\n7.5 pts
\n25 F
\nThe bibliographic information is incomplete and has 10 or more errors in citations.
\n30 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Source Selection Quality
\n20 pts
\nFull Marks
\nThe annotated bibliography contains the required number of excellent quality and relevant secondary and\/or primary sources.
\n18 pts
\n90 A
\nThe annotated bibliography contains the required number of high quality and relevant secondary and\/or primary sources.
\n16 pts
\n80 B
\nThe annotated bibliography contains at least 80% of the required number of good quality and relevant secondary and\/or primary sources.
\n14 pts
\n70 C
\nThe annotated bibliography contains at least 70% of the required number of satisfactory quality and relevant secondary and\/or primary sources.
\n12 pts
\n60 D
\nThe annotated bibliography contains at least 60% of the required number of adequate quality and relevant secondary and\/or primary sources.
\n10 pts
\n50 F
\nThe annotated bibliography contains 50% or fewer of the required number of adequate quality and relevant secondary and\/or primary sources.
\n5 pts
\n25 F
\nThe annotated bibliography contains no sources primary and\/or secondary sources of quality and relevance.
\n20 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome A Concise Description of the Work
\n20 pts
\nFull Marks
\nEach annotation contains a carefully concise, descriptive, and objective paraphrase or summary of the work.
\n18 pts
\n90 A
\nEach annotation contains a relatively concise, descriptive, and objective paraphrase or summary of the work.
\n16 pts
\n80 B
\nMost annotations contain a concise and descriptive paraphrase or summary of the work.
\n14 pts
\n70 C
\nMost annotations contain an adequate paraphrase or summary of the work.
\n12 pts
\n60 D
\nMost annotations contain a wordy and\/or unorganized paraphrase or summary of the work.
\n10 pts
\n50 F
\nEach annotation contains a wordy and\/ or unorganized paraphrase or summary of the work.
\n5 pts
\n25 F
\nEach annotation contains a poorly written and unorganized paraphrase or summary of the work.
\n20 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Relevant Commentary
\n20 pts
\nFull Marks
\nEach annotation contains excellent source commentary that is relevant to the writer\u2019s purpose and audience.
\n18 pts
\n90 A
\nEach annotation contains satisfactory source commentary that is relevant to the writer\u2019s purpose and audience.
\n16 pts
\n80 B
\nMost annotations contain adequate source commentary that is relevant to the writer\u2019s purpose and audience.
\n14 pts
\n70 C
\nMost annotations contain rudimentary source commentary that is somewhat relevant to the writer\u2019s purpose and audience.
\n12 pts
\n60 D
\nEach annotation contains source commentary that is irrelevant to the author\u2019s purpose and audience.
\n10 pts
\n50 F
\nEach annotation contains poorly written source commentary that is irrelevant to the author\u2019s purpose and audience.
\n5 pts
\n25 F
\nEach annotation contains incoherent source commentary.
\n20 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Additional Formatting Requirements
\n10 pts
\nFull Marks
\nThe annotated bibliography adheres to all additional formatting requirements such as alphabetizing, margins, title page (if required), title, etc. with no errors.
\n9 pts
\n90 A
\nThe annotated bibliography adheres to all additional formatting requirements such as alphabetizing, margins, title page (if required), title, etc. with 1-2 errors.
\n8 pts
\n80 B
\nThe annotated bibliography adheres to most additional formatting requirements such as alphabetizing, margins, title page (if required), title, etc. with 3-4 errors.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
got the topic from pro cons.org Instructions: Submit the Annotated Bibliography rough draft to this assignment link. Although you don’t have to submit the full draft, it should at least contain the scope and 3 of the 5 entries. Additional criteria: 1. MLA style 2. Times New Roman, size 12 font 3. Mostly academic sources […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[14],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/32681"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32681"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/32681\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=32681"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=32681"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=32681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}