<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n\/ 20 pts<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\nResearch<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/th>\n \n<\/p>\n\n 20 pts<\/span><\/div>\nSuperior: Exceeds Standards: 20 – 18 points<\/span><\/div>\nPresentation provides tangible evidence of a valid and relevant scholarly research effort. It considers scholarly literature, module resources on the topic and other sources of data<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/span><\/p>\n\n 17 pts<\/span><\/div>\nAverage: Meets Standards: 17 – 16 points<\/span><\/div>\nPresentation provides some evidence of a meaningful scholarly research effort. It considers some scholarly literature, module resources on the topic and other sources of data. Some inadequate and other common, unreliable sources.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/span><\/p>\n\n 15 pts<\/span><\/div>\nPoor: Does Not Meet Standards: 15 – 14 points<\/span><\/div>\nPresentation does not provide solid evidence of a meaningful scholarly research effort. It does not consider scholarly literature, module resources on the topic and other sources of data. The presentation uses inadequate or non-academic resources.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/span><\/p>\n\n 0 pts<\/span><\/div>\nFail: 13 – 0 points<\/span><\/div>\nDoes not meet minimal standards.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\/ 20 pts<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\nCritical Thought<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/th>\n \n<\/p>\n\n 20 pts<\/span><\/div>\nSuperior: Exceeds Standards: 20 – 18 points<\/span><\/div>\nPresentation demonstrates the application of critical thought that support project conclusions.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/span><\/p>\n\n 17 pts<\/span><\/div>\nAverage: Meets Standards: 17 – 16 points<\/span><\/div>\nPresentation demonstrates some application of first-order critical thought that either only partially support project conclusions.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/span><\/p>\n\n 15 pts<\/span><\/div>\nPoor: Does Not Meet Standards: 15 – 14 points<\/span><\/div>\nPresentation does not demonstrate the application of critical thought that support project conclusions or does not include project conclusions.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/span><\/p>\n\n 0 pts<\/span><\/div>\nFail: 13 – 0 points<\/span><\/div>\nDoes not meet minimal standards.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\/ 20 pts<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\nLogical Format and Structure<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/th>\n \n<\/p>\n\n 20 pts<\/span><\/div>\nSuperior: Exceeds Standards: 20 – 18 points<\/span><\/div>\nPresentation exhibits excellent logic in format and structure in all aspects.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/span><\/p>\n | | | | | | | | |