use these sources if possible: <\/p>\n
References\/annotations: Clements, C.John, et al. \u201cTechnologies \u00b7 <\/span>Omer, Saad B., et al. \u201cVaccine refusal, mandatory \u00b7 Nihl\u00e9n Fahlquist, Jessica. \u201cVaccine \u00b7 Paterson, Pauline, et al. \u201cVaccine \u00b7 Van Hooste, Wim Leo, and Micheline \u00b7 Troiano, G., and A. Nardi. \u201cVaccine \u00b7 Vaz, Olivia M., et al. \u201cMandatory In use these sources if possible: References\/annotations: (not in alphabetical order yet, will be on final report) Clements, C.John, et al. \u201cTechnologies that make administration of vaccines safer.\u201d Vaccine, vol. 22, no. 15\u201316, May 2004, pp. 2054\u20132058, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.vaccine.2004.01.008. \u00b7 This article explains the advances in technology and how they promote improvement for safety vaccine administration. The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[21],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/30235"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30235"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/30235\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30235"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=30235"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=30235"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=30235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n(not in alphabetical order yet, will be on final report)<\/span><\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n
\nthat make administration of vaccines safer.\u201d Vaccine<\/i>, vol. 22, no.
\n15\u201316, May 2004, pp. 2054\u20132058, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.vaccine.2004.01.008. <\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>This
\narticle explains the advances in technology and how they promote improvement
\nfor safety vaccine administration. The authors reference the benefits of these
\ntechnologies with a focus in risk reduction in needle related infections.<\/span><\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n
\nimmunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases.\u201d New England
\nJournal of Medicine<\/i>, vol. 360, no. 19, 7 May 2009, pp. 1981\u20131988,
\nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/nejmsa0806477. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>This
\narticle uses the Justice Principal ethic to explain vaccine refusal. Its focus
\nis that of health disparities with mandatory immunization advocating public
\nhealth.<\/span><\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n
\nhesitancy and trust. ethical aspects of risk communication.\u201d Scandinavian
\nJournal of Public Health<\/i>, vol. 46, no. 2, 28 Aug. 2017, pp. 182\u2013188,
\nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1403494817727162. <\/span><\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>In this article the author uses communication to influence vaccine
\nhesitant individuals to change their minds. This is a form of the Beneficence
\nPrinciple that promotes the best well-being of others and prevents harm.<\/span><\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n
\nhesitancy and healthcare providers.\u201d Vaccine<\/i>, vol. 34, no. 52, Dec.
\n2016, pp. 6700\u20136706, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.vaccine.2016.10.042. <\/span><\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>The authors of this article reference concerned from vaccine hesitancy
\nand its relationship with autonomy versus public health. It discuses ethical
\ndilemmas for healthcare providers while maintain respect for their patients
\nchoice and promoting vaccination.<\/span><\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n
\nBekaert. \u201cTo be or not to be vaccinated? the ethical aspects of influenza
\nvaccination among healthcare workers.\u201d International Journal of
\nEnvironmental Research and Public Health<\/i>, vol. 16, no. 20, 18 Oct. 2019, p.
\n3981, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijerph16203981. <\/span><\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>This article argues the ethics of influenza vaccination in healthcare
\nworkers as an obligation of morals to protect patients. One of the main points
\nis the do no harm stance that correlates with the beneficence principle. <\/span><\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n
\nhesitancy in the era of COVID-19.\u201d Public Health<\/i>, vol. 194, May 2021,
\npp. 245\u2013251, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.puhe.2021.02.025. <\/span><\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>The authors dive into the phenomena that was COVID-19 vaccine hesitation.
\nAlthough it does not talk about many ethical issues and focuses on
\nmisinformation and mistrust of the public, the article sill is a good source
\nfor expanding on vaccination hesitancy. An example is that of social media. <\/span><\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n
\nvaccination in Europe.\u201d Pediatrics<\/i>, vol. 145, no. 2, 1 Feb. 2020,
\nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1542\/peds.2019-0620. <\/span><\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n
\nthis article, the authors mention ethical implication of mandatory vaccination
\nin Europe. They write about ethical considerations such as public health
\nbenefits. This article will give insight as how other countries dealt with
\nmandatory vaccination and the effects it had on the European nations. <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"