{"id":26952,"date":"2024-05-27T19:24:31","date_gmt":"2024-05-27T19:24:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/the-financial-meltdown-of-2008-was-one-of-the-greatest-financial-catastrophes-that-occurred-in-the-21st-century\/"},"modified":"2024-05-27T19:24:31","modified_gmt":"2024-05-27T19:24:31","slug":"the-financial-meltdown-of-2008-was-one-of-the-greatest-financial-catastrophes-that-occurred-in-the-21st-century","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/the-financial-meltdown-of-2008-was-one-of-the-greatest-financial-catastrophes-that-occurred-in-the-21st-century\/","title":{"rendered":"The Financial meltdown of 2008 was one of the greatest financial catastrophes that occurred in the 21st century."},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The
\nFinancial meltdown of 2008 was one of the greatest financial  <\/span>catastrophes 
\n<\/span>that occurred in the 21st<\/sup> century.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Requirements<\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

1- An introduction and a conclusion.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

2-
\nWhy did it happen?<\/p>\n

 <\/b><\/p>\n

3- What was the
\nconsequences  <\/span>of this meltdown?<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

4- What was 
\n<\/span>the bank involvement in this meltdown?<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

5- How did the various regulators response in the US
\nand around the world respond to this meltdown.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

6- What lessons can be learnt <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

TOTAL 100 marks <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Students <\/span>must
\nproduce<\/span> <\/span>a <\/span>case<\/span> <\/span>analysis<\/span> as follows: 
\n<\/span><\/span>Assignment 3 between 2000
\n-3000 words. <\/span>A <\/span>bibliography<\/span> <\/span>containing<\/span> all relevant citations <\/span>in<\/span> <\/span>current<\/span>
\n<\/span>APA<\/span> <\/span>format<\/span> <\/span>must<\/span> <\/span>be<\/span> <\/span>included.
\nNote the requirements of Turnitin below.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

Assignment 3 Rubric
\n= \u2026.\/<\/b>100<\/span>x40<\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Dimension<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Excellent<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Good<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Satisfactory<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Poor<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Introduction <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(10 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

The
\n introduction and objectives are clearly stated. Background and context are
\n clearly articulated and linked to objectives effectively.<\/span><\/p>\n

(10-8 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

The
\n introduction and objectives are clear. Background and context are partially
\n described and mostly linked to objectives.<\/span><\/p>\n

(7-6 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

The
\n introduction and objectives are clear, but the background and context are not
\n well described nor clearly linked to objectives.<\/span><\/p>\n

(5 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

The
\n introduction is vague. Background and context are vague or absolutely lacking
\n and there are no clear links to objectives.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(0-4 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Analysis<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(30 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Analysis
\n is highly relevant to the assignment requirements and presented clearly and
\n logically. Strong link is made between theory and practice.<\/span><\/p>\n

(30
\n -26 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Analysis
\n is relevant to the assignment requirements but is not always presented
\n clearly and \/ or logically. Strong link made between theory and practice.<\/span><\/p>\n

(25-
\n 20 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Analysis
\n is reasonably relevant to the assignment requirements. <\/span><\/p>\n

At
\n times, the analysis is not clearly or logically presented. A fair link made
\n between theory and practice.<\/span><\/p>\n

(19-15
\n marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Analysis
\n is not relevant to the assignment requirements. <\/span><\/p>\n

Analysis
\n is vague and illogical. The link between theory and practice is unclear and
\n illogical or has major errors.<\/span><\/p>\n

(14 -0 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Case laws<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(40 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

The
\n Case law presented, and facts is highly relevant to the assignment.<\/span><\/p>\n

(40
\n -33 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

The
\n Case laws presented, and facts is relevant to the assignment.<\/span><\/p>\n

(32-25
\n marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

The
\n Case laws presented, and facts is somewhat relevant to the assignment.<\/span><\/p>\n

(24
\n -20 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

The
\n Case laws presented, and facts is not relevant to the assignment.<\/span><\/p>\n

(19
\n \u2013 0 marks)`<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Conclusion<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(10 marks) <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Conclusion
\n is clearly stated and connections to the arguments and positions are clear
\n and relevant. The underlying logic is explicit.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(10-8 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Conclusion
\n is clearly stated but connections to arguments and positions are not always
\n clear and relevant \u2013 some aspects may not be connected or minor errors in the
\n underlying logic are present.<\/span><\/p>\n

(7-6 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Conclusion
\n is fairly well stated and connections to arguments and positions are somewhat
\n unclear \/ irrelevant. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(5 marks)<\/span><\/b>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Conclusion
\n is very poorly stated and the connections to the arguments and positions are
\n incorrect, unclear, irrelevant, or presented without explanation. Underlying
\n logic has major errors.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(4-0 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Writing<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(5 marks)  <\/span><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

The
\n Project is coherently organized and easy to follow. There are no spelling or
\n grammatical errors and technical terms are clearly defined. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(5 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

The
\n Project is generally well organized and mostly easy to follow. There are only
\n a few minor spellings and\/or grammatical errors, and technical terms are not
\n clearly defined.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(4 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

The
\n Project is fairly well organized and somewhat easy to follow. There are a few
\n minor spellings and \/ or grammatical errors and technical terms are not
\n defined. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(3 mark)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

The
\n Project is poorly organized and difficult to read \u2013 does not flow logically
\n from one part to another. It is not easy to follow. There are several
\n spellings and\/or grammatical errors; technical terms are not defined or are
\n poorly defined. <\/span><\/p>\n

(0-2 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Referencing<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(5 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Four
\n or more references were used\/ cited. <\/span><\/p>\n

References
\n were: <\/span><\/p>\n

Appropriate
\n for the context of the Project. <\/span><\/p>\n

Were
\n very current where applicable using references produced during the last 5
\n years. <\/span><\/p>\n

Used
\n effectively in the Project. <\/span><\/p>\n

Written
\n using the latest APA style format. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(5 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Three
\n references were used\/ cited. <\/span><\/p>\n

References
\n were: <\/span><\/p>\n

Generally
\n appropriate for the context of the Project. <\/span><\/p>\n

Were
\n not always current, using references produced during the last 6 years. <\/span><\/p>\n

Used
\n most effectively in the Project. <\/span><\/p>\n

Written
\n using the latest APA style format for the most part.<\/span><\/p>\n

(4 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Two
\n references were used\/ cited. <\/span><\/p>\n

References
\n were: <\/span><\/p>\n

1.      
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span>Reasonably
\n appropriate for the context of the Project<\/span><\/p>\n

2.      
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span>Were for the
\n most part, outdated, using references produced during the last 7 years.<\/span><\/p>\n

3.      
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span>Used somewhat
\n effectively in the Project.<\/span><\/p>\n

4.      
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span>Written using
\n the latest APA style format was inconsistent throughout <\/span><\/p>\n

(3 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Only
\n one reference or no references were used\/ cited. <\/span><\/p>\n

References,
\n if used were: <\/span><\/p>\n

1.   
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span>Not appropriate
\n for the context of Project. <\/span><\/p>\n

2.   
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span>Were for the
\n most part, outdated, using references produced during the last 8 years or
\n more.<\/span><\/p>\n

3.   
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span>Ineffectively
\n used in the Project. <\/span><\/p>\n

4.   
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span>Not written
\n using the Latest APA style.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(0-2 marks)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n



\n<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Financial meltdown of 2008 was one of the greatest financial  catastrophes  that occurred in the 21st century.   Requirements   1- An introduction and a conclusion.   2- Why did it happen?   3- What was the consequences  of this meltdown?   4- What was  the bank involvement in this meltdown?   5- How […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[9],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/26952"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26952"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/26952\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26952"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=26952"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=26952"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=26952"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}