{"id":26699,"date":"2024-05-24T23:03:08","date_gmt":"2024-05-24T23:03:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/the-relationship-between-nursing-staffing-nurse-outcomes-in-nursing-homes-and-the-quality-of-care\/"},"modified":"2024-05-24T23:03:08","modified_gmt":"2024-05-24T23:03:08","slug":"the-relationship-between-nursing-staffing-nurse-outcomes-in-nursing-homes-and-the-quality-of-care","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/the-relationship-between-nursing-staffing-nurse-outcomes-in-nursing-homes-and-the-quality-of-care\/","title":{"rendered":"The relationship between nursing staffing\/nurse outcomes in nursing homes and the quality of care."},"content":{"rendered":"

Each student within the Leadership and Quality Improvement Presentation group will find one unique, peer-reviewed research article related to the group topic that will be used to contribute to the presentation. The article must be less than 5 years old and from a scholarly, peer-reviewed source. If you submit the same article as one of your peers in the group, you may be required to re-submit the assignment. Each group member will turn in their assigned article with a 250- 350-word, double-spaced summary of the article. Summary must contain:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Correctly formatted APA reference for the article.<\/li>\n
  2. One paragraph summary that discusses the research problem, process, and results.<\/li>\n
  3. One paragraph discussing how this article relates to the topic and how it will help complete the presentation<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Refer toRubric<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    \n
    \n
    \n\n\n\n\n\n
    \n
    NUR 282 Research Article Summary 0221<\/span><\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/div>\n<\/caption>\n
    Criteria<\/th>\nRatings<\/th>\nPts<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    \n
    \n
    <\/i> <\/span>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>Correctly formatted APA reference<\/span><\/p>\n
    <\/div>\n
    threshold: <\/span>7.5<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n\n\n\n\n
    \n
    \n
    10<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Exceeds Expectations -The citation is in APA format with no errors<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    \n
    7.5<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Satisfactory- The citation has 1 \u2013 2 errors in formatting<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    \n
    5<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Needs Improvement- The citation has 3 or more errors<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    \n
    0<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Unacceptable-Citation is missing or not in APA.<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    10<\/span> <\/span>pts
    <\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \n
    \n
    <\/i> <\/span>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>Summary of: Research problem; Description of research process; Results of study<\/span><\/p>\n
    CSLO 5<\/div>\n
    threshold: <\/span>30.0<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n\n\n\n\n
    \n
    \n
    40<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Exceeds Expectations -\u2022 Content is in-depth and well-organized \u2022 All 3 criteria are present and substantive<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    \n
    30<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Satisfactory- \u2022 Content is acceptable and adequately organized \u2022 All 3 criteria are present<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    \n
    15<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Needs Improvement- \u2022 Content is lacking or minimally organized \u2022 Not all criteria meet minimum standards<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    \n
    0<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Unacceptable- Content is lacking and not organized<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    40<\/span> <\/span>pts
    <\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \n
    \n
    <\/i> <\/span>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>Discussion of: How does the article relate to the group topic? How will the article help me complete the presentation?<\/span><\/p>\n
    CSLO 5<\/div>\n
    threshold: <\/span>30.0<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n\n\n\n\n
    \n
    \n
    40<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Exceeds Expectations -\u2022 Discussion demonstrates in-depth rationale of article\u2019s relevance to topic and how it will contribute to the presentation \u2022 Both criteria are discussed with a high level of critical thinking<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    \n
    30<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Satisfactory- \u2022 Discussion demonstrates an acceptable rationale displaying article has some relevance to topic and how it will contribute to the presentation \u2022 Both criteria are discussed<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    \n
    15<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Needs Improvement- \u2022 Discussion demonstrates minimal expectations of article\u2019s relevance to topic or how it will contribute to the presentation \u2022 Not all criteria meet minimum standards<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    \n
    0<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Unacceptable- \u2022 Article has no relevance to topic \u2022 Summary does not meet minimal expectations \u2022 Lack of detail on article\u2019s relevance to group topic or how the article will be used to complete the presentation.<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    40<\/span> <\/span>pts
    <\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \n
    \n
    <\/i> <\/span>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>APA, Grammar, and Mechanics<\/span><\/p>\n
    Article is less than 5 years old (unless it is a seminal work) and from an appropriate, peer-reviewed source. There are no spelling or grammar errors. At least 250 words and no more than 350 words. Font used is Times New Roman 12 pt. 1-inch margins and double-spaced.<\/div>\n
    threshold: <\/span>7.5<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n\n\n\n\n
    \n
    \n
    10<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Exceeds Expectations- The summary and analysis meet and adequately addresses all the criteria with no exceptions or errors. There are no grammar or spelling errors. Peer-reviewed article less than 5 years old. Meets length requirement.<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    \n
    7.5<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Satisfactory- The summary meets and adequately address all the criteria with 1 \u2013 2 exceptions or errors. Peer-reviewed article less than 5 years old. Meets length requirement.<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    \n
    5<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Needs Improvement- The summary meets and adequately address all the criteria with 3 \u2013 4 exceptions or errors. Article is not peer-reviewed or is over 5 years old. Length requirement is not met.<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    \n
    0<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n
    Unacceptable- The summary does not adequately address the criteria or has 5 or more errors. Length requirement is not met; Article not peer-reviewed and\/or is over 5 years old.<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
    		\n
    10<\/span> <\/span>pts
    <\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \n
    Total Points: <\/span>100<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/div>\n

    <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Each student within the Leadership and Quality Improvement Presentation group will find one unique, peer-reviewed research article related to the group topic that will be used to contribute to the presentation. The article must be less than 5 years old and from a scholarly, peer-reviewed source. If you submit the same article as one of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[13],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/26699"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26699"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/26699\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26699"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=26699"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=26699"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=26699"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}