{"id":24982,"date":"2024-05-09T12:55:41","date_gmt":"2024-05-09T12:55:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/use-a-demand-and-supply-diagram-to-assess-the-possible-impact-of-a-removal-of-tariffs-on-consumers-firms-and-government-in-the-uk\/"},"modified":"2024-05-09T12:55:41","modified_gmt":"2024-05-09T12:55:41","slug":"use-a-demand-and-supply-diagram-to-assess-the-possible-impact-of-a-removal-of-tariffs-on-consumers-firms-and-government-in-the-uk","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/use-a-demand-and-supply-diagram-to-assess-the-possible-impact-of-a-removal-of-tariffs-on-consumers-firms-and-government-in-the-uk\/","title":{"rendered":"Use a demand and supply diagram to assess the possible impact of a removal of tariffs on consumers, firms and government in the uk"},"content":{"rendered":"

Read the information in Extracts 1, 2 and 3 concerning the 2021 trade agreement between the UK and New Zealand. Drawing on these extracts and the module materials, MUST CREATE OWN demand and supply diagram to assess the possible impact of a removal of tariffs on consumers, firms and government in the UK. In your answer, use this analysis to provide a discussion of the arguments for free trade between the UK and New Zealand, versus those for protectionism.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

MUST CREATE A SUPPLY AND DEMAND DIAGRAM NOT ONE FROM THE INTERNET.<\/p>\n

SOURCE LIST BELOW PLEASE USE ANY OF THESE SOURCES TO RFERENCE PLENTY OF CHOICE.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Extract 1<\/h2>\n
\n
\n

New Zealand\u2013UK free trade agreement: agreement in principle<\/h3>\n
\n

New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 20 October 2021<\/h4>\n

New Zealand and the UK have reached agreement in principle on the key elements of a new high quality, comprehensive and progressive free trade agreement (FTA). These are set out below.<\/p>\n

\u2026<\/p>\n

New Zealand and the UK commit to the removal of all customs duties on bilateral trade, with most tariff lines, covering the vast majority of current exports, being fully liberalised on entry into force of the agreement. Other mechanisms will facilitate trade and address non-tariff barriers between our two countries.<\/p>\n

Key commitments include:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • New Zealand and the UK will remove customs duties on 100% of tariff lines for originating products, in line with the agreed treatments which will be set out in respective tariff schedules.<\/li>\n
  • The UK will eliminate tariffs on 96.7% of tariff lines on the day the FTA enters into force.<\/li>\n
  • New Zealand will eliminate tariffs on 100% of tariff lines on the day the FTA enters into force.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
    (New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 2021, p. 1)<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
    \n

    Extract 2  <\/h2>\n
    \n
    \n

    New Zealand trade deal: government \u2018swerving\u2019 concerns, claim MPs<\/h3>\n
    \n

    Maria Gon\u00e7alves, 25 January 2023<\/h4>\n

    The UK government is \u201cswerving\u201d concerns that a New Zealand trade deal would lead to unfair competition for local farmers, MPs have claimed.<\/p>\n

    A cross-party group of MPs called out the government this week for not addressing concerns that slashing tariffs on cheap NZ goods such as lamb and beef would lead to a contraction of the food sector.<\/p>\n

    On Tuesday, the government insisted the UK would not experience a \u201csignificant influx\u201d of agri-foods imports as a result of the free trade agreement signed in February.<\/p>\n

    International trade secretary Kemi Badenoch said the deal would boost the UK economy and \u201cdeliver multiple benefits for our people, businesses, and economy\u201d.<\/p>\n

    \u201cThe UK\u2013New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is estimated to increase trade with New Zealand by almost 60%, boost the UK economy by \u00a3800m and increase UK household wages by \u00a3200m in the long run,\u201d she wrote in the government\u2019s official response to the international trade committee\u2019s inquiry into the NZ trade agreement.<\/p>\n

    However, the committee responded this week that the government failed to address its concerns that the \u201cabsence of a single, clear trade strategy\u201d would negatively affect domestic suppliers in the long run.<\/p>\n

    \u201cIn its response, the government swerves the committee\u2019s recommendation to publish an overarching trade strategy\u201d, it said in a statement, which \u201cleaves agricultural producers exposed to risk\u201d.<\/p>\n

    \u201cSome might go as far as to characterise this as playing fast and loose with agriculture in the UK,\u201d said the committee\u2019s chairman, Angus Brendan MacNeil MP.<\/p>\n

    The committee said it recognised that cheaper NZ imports \u201cmay benefit consumers particularly during the cost of living crisis\u201d, but that it was concerned the government had not considered the full scale of the food security risks the deal brought in the long term.<\/p>\n

    MPs first warned the government the New Zealand Free Trade agreement would negatively affect the agricultural sector by opening UK markets to cheaper imports including beef, sheepmeat and dairy, in an October 2022 report following a six-month-long inquiry.<\/p>\n

    It questioned whether the pros and cons of tariff liberalisation had been fully considered by the government, claiming increased competition could lead to a contraction of the UK\u2019s agriculture, forestry, fishing, and semi-processed food sectors.<\/p>\n

    \u201cThe government\u2019s confidence that this will not be an unintended consequence of the New Zealand deal appears rooted in the belief that global affairs will continue as they have done in previous years.<\/p>\n

    \u201cTime will tell, and for the sake of these already hard-pressed businesses and farmers, we hope the government\u2019s analysis is proved correct, especially given ongoing geopolitical instability.\u201d<\/p>\n

    The committee called for a debate and a vote in Parliament on the agreement. The government agreed Parliament should have an opportunity to debate similar post-Brexit agreements in the future. However, it disagreed that MPs should be able to vote on them.<\/p>\n

    (Gon\u00e7alves, 2023)<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
    \n

    Extract 3<\/h2>\n
    \n
    \n

    UK-New Zealand trade deal a \u2018great step forward\u2019 for SMEs<\/h3>\n
    \n

    GM Business Growth Hub, 15 March 2022<\/h4>\n

    The newly-signed free trade deal between the UK and New Zealand, the UK\u2019s latest in the targeted Asia-Pacific region, is expected to offer significant benefits for smaller exporters.<\/p>\n

    The free trade deal signed on 28 February will remove trade barriers on a wide range of UK goods and services. This includes the elimination of tariffs for goods in areas such as clothing and footwear, food and drink, furniture, machinery and chemicals.<\/p>\n

    The agreement is described as the most advanced New Zealand has signed with any nation bar Australia, and is part of the UK government\u2019s wider plan to refocus trade on the Asia-Pacific region. It is also being hailed as one of the UK\u2019s \u2018greenest\u2019 trade deals to-date, with low carbon services and technology subject to significant benefits.<\/p>\n

    According to the government, SMEs [small and medium-sized enterprises] will now find it easier to break into the New Zealand market as a result of \u201cmodernised customs procedures\u201d such as digital documents and rapid customs clearance. A chapter devoted to SMEs in the agreement also sets a guarantee for small businesses to benefit from \u201cpractical advice and support\u201d to find opportunities in New Zealand, including dedicated websites for small exporters.<\/p>\n

    In addition, flexible rules of origin mean that most UK manufacturers will be able to qualify for tariff-free trade whilst maintaining their existing supply chains.<\/p>\n

    Mike Cherry, National Chair of the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB), said:<\/p>\n

    \n
    \n

    \u201cNew Zealand is a key market for UK small businesses \u2013 close to a third of smaller exporters already have ties to the nation. As such, this deal marks a great step forward, and we are pleased to see inclusion of a dedicated SME chapter that will help more small businesses from both countries to take part in international trade and, in doing so, spur our global economic recovery.<\/p>\n

    \u201cWe also welcome the important additional measures outlined as part of the agreement, not least around the streamlining of self-declaration of origin procedures and bringing more small businesses into government supply chains.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    Around 5,900 UK SMEs currently export to New Zealand and manufacturing sector exports totalled \u00a3670 million in 2020. Recent research by Santander found that almost a quarter of British exporters forecast significant growth opportunities in Australia and New Zealand.<\/p>\n

    (GM Business Growth Hub, 2022)<\/div>\n
    SOURCES TO REFERENCE:<\/div>\n
    \n

    Bain, J. (1956) <\/span>Barriers to new competition<\/i>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.<\/p>\n

    Berle, A. and Means, G. (1932) <\/span>The modern corporation and private property<\/i>. New York: Commerce Clearing House.<\/p>\n

    De Henau, J. (2022) \u2018Simulating employment and fiscal effects of public investment in high-quality universal childcare in the UK\u2019, <\/span>International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy<\/i>, 16(3). Available at: https:\/\/ijccep.springeropen.com\/counter\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40723-022-00096-y.pdf (Accessed: 10 May 2023).<\/p>\n

    Demsetz, H. (1973) \u2018Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy\u2019, <\/span>The Journal of Law & Economics<\/i>, 16(1), pp. 1\u20139.<\/p>\n

    The Economist (2023) <\/span>Many countries are seeing a revival of industrial policy<\/i>, 10 January. Available at: https:\/\/www.economist.com\/special-report\/2022\/01\/10\/many-countries-are-seeing-a-revival-of-industrial-policy (Accessed: 10 May 2023).<\/p>\n

    Gilbert, R. and Katz, M. (2001) \u2018An economist\u2019s guide to U.S. v. Microsoft\u2019, <\/span>Journal of Economic Perspectives<\/i>, 15(2), pp. 25\u201344.<\/p>\n

    Gov.uk (2016) <\/span>Water tank firms admit cartel and agree to pay \u00a32.6 million fines<\/i>, 21 March. Available at: https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/water-tank-firms-admit-cartel-and-agree-to-pay-26-million-fines (Accessed: 28 May 2023).<\/p>\n

    Gov.uk (2023) <\/span>Construction firms fined nearly \u00a360 million for breaking competition law by bid rigging<\/i>, 23 March. Available at: https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/construction-firms-fined-nearly-60-million-for-breaking-competition-law-by-bid-rigging (Accessed: 10 May 2023).<\/p>\n

    Grant, R. M. (2010) <\/span>Contemporary strategy analysis<\/i>, 7th edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.<\/p>\n

    Hirschman, A. O. (1977) \u2018A generalized linkage approach to development, with special reference to staples\u2019, <\/span>Essays on Economic Development and Cultural Change<\/i>, 25, pp. 67\u201398.<\/p>\n

    Jensen, M. C. (1986) \u2018Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers\u2019, <\/span>The American Economic Review<\/i>, 76(2), pp. 323\u2013329.<\/p>\n

    Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976) \u2018Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure\u2019, <\/span>Journal of Financial Economics<\/i>, 3(4), pp. 305\u2013360.<\/p>\n

    Juh\u00e1sz, R., Lane, N. and Rodrik, D. (2023) <\/span>The new economics of industrial policy<\/i>. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper 31538. Available at: https:\/\/www.nber.org\/system\/files\/working_papers\/w31538\/w31538.pdf (Accessed: 27 August 2023).<\/p>\n

    Kantar (2023) <\/span>Great Britain: grocery market share (12 weeks ending)<\/i>. Available at: https:\/\/www.kantarworldpanel.com\/en\/grocery-market-share\/great-britain\/ (Accessed: 12 May 2023).<\/p>\n

    Khanna, T. and Yafeh. Y. (2007) \u2018Business groups in emerging markets: paragons or parasites?\u2019, <\/span>Journal of Economic Literature<\/i>, 45(2), pp. 331\u2013372.<\/p>\n

    LaComb, T. Z. (2023) \u2018Kroger-Albertsons merger faces additional headwinds\u2019, <\/span>The National Law Review<\/i>, 31 March, XIII(254). Available at: https:\/\/www.natlawreview.com\/article\/kroger-albertsons-merger-faces-additional-headwinds (Accessed: 4 June 2023).<\/p>\n

    Law, J. (2009) \u2018Four-firm concentration ratio\u2019, <\/span>A Dictionary of Business and Management<\/i>. 5th edn. Oxford Reference [online]. Available at: https:\/\/www.oxfordreference.com\/display\/10.1093\/oi\/authority.20110803095831707;jsessionid=31F9DF33A23F02163B6B55AF7597F5E4 (Accessed: 28 May 2023).<\/p>\n

    Moors, K. (2017) \u2018Ecuador\u2019s defection from the OPEC deal doesn\u2019t matter\u2019, <\/span>oilprice.com<\/i>, 24 July. Available at: https:\/\/oilprice.com\/Energy\/Oil-Prices\/Ecuadors-Defection-From-The-OPEC-Deal-Doesnt-Matter.html (Accessed: 4 June 2023).<\/p>\n

    Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982) <\/span>An evolutionary theory of economic change<\/i>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.<\/p>\n

    Novet, J. (2023) \u2018Microsoft is sprinkling OpenAI everywhere to try and keep software makers interested in its platforms\u2019, <\/span>CNBC<\/i>, 25 May. Available at: https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2023\/05\/25\/microsoft-sprinkles-openai-everywhere-to-retain-software-partners.html (Accessed: 25 May 2023).<\/p>\n

    OECD (2012) \u2018Industrial policy and territorial development: lessons from Korea\u2019, <\/span>OECD Development Centre<\/i>. Available at: https:\/\/www.oecd-ilibrary.org\/development\/industrial-policy-and-territorial-development_9789264173897-en#:~:text=Lessons%20from%20Korea%20OECD%20Development%20Centre%20This%20report,and%20policy%20experience%20with%20emerging%20and%20developing%20economi. (Accessed: 27 August 2023).<\/p>\n

    The Open University (2022) \u2018Figure 8.1 The industry, or meso, level as part of the external environment\u2019. <\/span>B302 Strategic Management<\/i>. Available at: https:\/\/learn2.open.ac.uk\/mod\/oucontent\/view.php?id=1971358&section=3 (Accessed: 9 August 2023).<\/p>\n

    Penrose, E. (1959) <\/span>The theory of the growth of the firm<\/i>. Oxford: Blackwell.<\/p>\n

    Porter, M. E. (1979) \u2018How competitive forces shape strategy\u2019, <\/span>Harvard Business Review<\/i>, 57(2), pp. 137\u2013145.<\/p>\n

    Richter, F. (2020) \u2018Google\u2019s search dominance\u2019, <\/span>Statista<\/i>, 21 October. Available at: https:\/\/www-statista-com.libezproxy.open.ac.uk\/chart\/23250\/search-market-share-in-the-united-states\/ (Accessed: 23 May 2023).<\/p>\n

    RWE (2023) <\/span>RWE and Equinor agree on strategic partnership for security of supply and decarbonisation<\/i>, 5 January. Available at: https:\/\/www.rwe.com\/en\/press\/rwe-ag\/2023-01-05-rwe-and-equinor-agree-on-strategic-partnership-for-security-of-supply-and-decarbonisation\/ (Accessed: 12 May 2023).<\/p>\n

    Schumpeter, J. A. (1943) <\/span>Capitalism, socialism and democracy<\/i>. Reprint. Oxford: Routledge, 2010.<\/p>\n

    Shapiro, C. (1989) \u2018The theory of business strategy\u2019, <\/span>The RAND Journal of Economics<\/i>, 20(1), pp. 125\u2013137.<\/p>\n

    Smith, A. (2007) <\/span>An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations: books I, II, III, IV and V<\/i>. Available at: https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/ml\/libri\/s\/SmithA_WealthNations_p.pdf (Accessed: 20 May 2023).<\/p>\n

    Statista (2023) <\/span>Global market share held by mobile operating systems 1st quarter to 2nd quarter 2023<\/i>. Available at: https:\/\/www-statista-com.libezproxy.open.ac.uk\/statistics\/272698\/global-market-share-held-by-mobile-operating-systems-since-2009\/ (Accessed: 15 May 2023).<\/p>\n

    Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1998) \u2018Dynamic capabilities and strategic management\u2019, <\/span>Strategic Management Journal<\/i>, 18(7), pp. 509\u2013533.<\/p>\n

    US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (2018) <\/span>Herfindahl-Hirschman Index<\/i>. Available at: https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/atr\/herfindahl-hirschman-index (Accessed: 26 August 2023).<\/p>\n

    Vanian, J. (2023) \u2018Bill Gates says A.I. could kill Google Search and Amazon as we know them\u2019, <\/span>CNBC<\/i>, 22 May. Available at: https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2023\/05\/22\/bill-gates-predicts-the-big-winner-in-ai-smart-assistants.html (Accessed: 24 May 2023).<\/p>\n

    Wangwe, S. <\/span>et al<\/i>. (2022) \u2018Upgrading under globalization in health-related industries in Tanzania: the case for dynamic industrial deepening\u2019, <\/span>Innovation and Development<\/i>, 12(3), pp. 479\u2013496. Available at: https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/2157930X.2021.1886415 (Accessed: 25 May 2023).<\/p>\n

    Women\u2019s Budget Group (2022) <\/span>Childcare is infrastructure: amendment to the Levelling Up Bill<\/i>. Available at: https:\/\/wbg.org.uk\/media\/press-releases\/childcare-is-infrastructure-amendment-to-the-levelling-up-bill\/ (Accessed: 28 May 2023).<\/p>\n

    World Bank (2023) \u2018Historical data \u2013 doing business \u2013 with scores (Excel)\u2019, <\/span>Business Ready (B-READY)<\/i>. Available at: https:\/\/www.worldbank.org\/en\/businessready\/doing-business-legacy (Accessed: 10 May 2023).<\/p>\n

    Balassa, B. (1964) \u2018The purchasing power parity doctrine: a reappraisal\u2019, <\/span>Journal of Political Economy<\/i>, 72(6), pp. 584\u2013596.<\/div>\n
    Baldwin, R.E. (2008) <\/span>The development and testing of Heckscher\u2013Ohlin trade models<\/i>. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<\/div>\n
    Benavides, A. (2011) \u2018The intra-industry structure of the United States\u2019 international trade with selected industrialized and developing nations\u2019, <\/span>International Journal of Business and Social Science<\/i>, 2(22), pp. 1\u20136.<\/div>\n
    Bhagwati, J. (1958) \u2018Immiserizing growth: a geometrical note\u2019, <\/span>Review of Economic Studies<\/i>, 25(3), pp. 201\u2013205.<\/div>\n
    Broda, C., Lim\u00e3o, N. and Weinstein, D.E. (2008) \u2018Optimal tariffs and market power: the evidence\u2019, <\/span>American Economic Review<\/i>, 98(5), pp. 2032\u20132065.<\/div>\n
    Bussolo, M., de Hoyos, R. and Medvedev, D. (2011) \u2018Free trade in agriculture and global poverty\u2019, <\/span>The World Economy<\/i>, 34(12), pp. 2019\u20132043.<\/div>\n
    Dollar, D. and Kraay, A. (2004) \u2018Trade, growth and poverty\u2019, <\/span>Economic Journal<\/i>, 114, pp. F22\u2013F49.<\/div>\n
    International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2015) Press release: IMF staff completes the 2015 Article IV consultation mission to China, 26 May. Available at: https:\/\/www.imf.org\/en\/News\/Articles\/2015\/09\/14\/01\/49\/pr15237 (Accessed: 24 October 2022).<\/div>\n
    Leamer, E.E. (1998) \u2018Leontief paradox\u2019, in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (1998) <\/span>The new Palgrave: a dictionary of economics, volume 3<\/i>, pp. 166\u2013167.<\/div>\n
    Leontief, W. (1953) \u2018Domestic production and foreign trade; the American capital position re-examined\u2019, <\/span>Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society<\/i>, 97(4), pp. 332\u2013349.<\/div>\n
    Lucas, R.E. (2009) \u2018Trade and the diffusion of the Industrial Revolution\u2019, <\/span>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics<\/i>, 1(1), pp. 1\u201325.<\/div>\n
    Ohlin, B. and Heckscher, E.F. (1991) <\/span>Heckscher-Ohlin trade theory<\/i>. Translated from Swedish by Flam, H. and Flanders, M.J., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<\/div>\n
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2022) <\/span>Decile ratios of gross earnings<\/i>, OECD.Stat. Available at: https:\/\/stats.oecd.org\/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=DEC_I# (Accessed: 23 October 2022).<\/div>\n
    Rakotoarisoa, M.A., Khorana, S. and Narayanan, B. (2019) \u2018Trade liberalization \u2013 labour productivity nexus: the case of Sub Saharan Africa\u2019, <\/span>Socio-Economic Challenges<\/i>, 3(1), pp. 5\u201326. Available at: http:\/\/doi.org\/10.21272\/sec.3(1).5-26.2019<\/div>\n
    Ricardo, D. (1817) <\/span>On the principles of political economy and taxation<\/i>. London: John Murray. Available at: https:\/\/www.econlib.org\/library\/Ricardo\/ricP.html (Accessed: 22 October 2022).<\/div>\n
    Rodrik, D. (1998) \u2018Why is trade reform so dif\ufb01cult in Africa?\u2019, <\/span>Journal of African Economies<\/i>, 7(suppl. 1), pp. 10\u201336.<\/div>\n
    Sachs, J. and Warner, A. (1995) \u2018Economic reform and the process of global integration\u2019, <\/span>Brookings Papers on Economic Activity <\/span><\/i>no. 1. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.<\/div>\n
    Samuelson, P. (1964) \u2018Theoretical notes on trade problems\u2019, <\/span>The Review of Economics and Statistics<\/i>, 46(2), pp. 145\u2013154.<\/div>\n
    Sawada, Y. (2009) \u2018The immiserizing growth: an empirical evaluation\u2019, <\/span>Applied Economics<\/i>, 41(13), 1613\u20131620.<\/div>\n
    Schreyer, P. and Keochlin, F. (2002) \u2018Purchasing power parities \u2013 measurement and uses\u2019, <\/span>Statistics Brief<\/i> <\/span>3. Available at: https:\/\/www.oecd.org\/sdd\/prices-ppp\/2078177.pdf (Accessed: 24 October 2022).<\/div>\n
    Subramanian, A. (2010) <\/span>New PPP-based estimates of renminbi undervaluation and policy implications<\/i>, Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief, April, [online] www.iie.com\/publications\/pb\/pb10-08.pdf (Accessed: 8 December 2012).<\/div>\n
    US Library of Congress (no date) <\/span>China\u2019s currency policies<\/i>. Available at: https:\/\/guides.loc.gov\/us-trade-with-china\/currency-policies (Accessed: 24 October 2022).<\/div>\n
    Van Reenen, J. (2011) \u2018Wage inequality, technology and trade: 21st century evidence\u2019, <\/span>Labour Economics<\/i>, 18(6), pp. 730\u2013741.<\/div>\n
    World Bank (2022a) <\/span>GDP (constant 2015 US$)<\/i>, Data. Available at: https:\/\/data.worldbank.org (Accessed: 22 October 2022).<\/div>\n
    World Bank (2022b) <\/span>Net barter terms of trade index, 2000=100)<\/i>, Data. Available at: https:\/\/data.worldbank.org\/ (Accessed: 22 October 2022).<\/div>\n
    World Trade Organization (WTO) (2007) <\/span>Sixty years of the multilateral trading system: achievements and challenges<\/i>. Geneva: WTO.<\/div>\n
    World Trade Organization (WTO) (2022) <\/span>Merchandise export volume fixed-base indices \u2013 annual (2015=100)<\/i>, WTO Stats. Available at: https:\/\/stats.wto.org\/ (Accessed: 22 October 2022).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Read the information in Extracts 1, 2 and 3 concerning the 2021 trade agreement between the UK and New Zealand. Drawing on these extracts and the module materials, MUST CREATE OWN demand and supply diagram to assess the possible impact of a removal of tariffs on consumers, firms and government in the UK. In your […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[43],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/24982"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24982"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/24982\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24982"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=24982"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=24982"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=24982"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}