{"id":23316,"date":"2024-04-28T21:50:22","date_gmt":"2024-04-28T21:50:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/defend-a-view-on-personal-identity-and-use-this-view-to-support-an-answer-to-the-question-can-we-survive-the-death-of-our-bodies-here-is-a-suggestion-for-how-to\/"},"modified":"2024-04-28T21:50:22","modified_gmt":"2024-04-28T21:50:22","slug":"defend-a-view-on-personal-identity-and-use-this-view-to-support-an-answer-to-the-question-can-we-survive-the-death-of-our-bodies-here-is-a-suggestion-for-how-to","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/defend-a-view-on-personal-identity-and-use-this-view-to-support-an-answer-to-the-question-can-we-survive-the-death-of-our-bodies-here-is-a-suggestion-for-how-to\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Defend a view on personal identity, and use this view to support an answer to the question \u2018Can we survive the death of our bodies?\u2019.\u2019 Here is a suggestion for how to do so in detail:"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">Main instruction<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">: \u2018Defend a view on personal identity, and use this view to support an answer to the question \u2018Can we survive the death of our bodies?\u2019.\u2019 Here is a suggestion for how to do so in<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">detail<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<li style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">? &nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">Introduction<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">: This should be one short paragraph in which i) you indicate to the reader what will be your answer to the main question, and ii) you indicate how you will support your answer. (For example: \u201cI\u2019ll argue that the<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">X<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">view on personal identity is the best one, and that it implies that we can\/cannot survive our bodily deaths.\u201d [\u2018<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">X<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">\u2019 can be the soul, body, brain, memory, or psychological view.])<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">? &nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">Part I<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">: explain your view on personal identity (i.e. give examples, explain technical terms, contrast to other views, etc).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">? &nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">Part II<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">: argue for the view. (That is, explain what you think are the best features of, or arguments for, your view, or what you think are the main problems with alternative views.)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">? &nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">Part III<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">: defend the view against an objection (either consider an objection to your view on personal identity and then argue why you think this objection is unsuccessful, or consider an argument in favor of another view and then argue why you think this argument is successful.)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">? &nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">Part IV<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">: explain how your view implies a positive\/negative response to the question \u2018Can we survive the death of our bodies?\u2019. (Explain and make appropriate distinctions concering the expression \u2018death of the body\u2019. What exactly does that mean?)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">*<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">The<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">order<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">of the items above is just a<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">suggestion<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">. Feel free to imagine a different way to order your paper. Maybe you\u2019ll find a structure that will make more sense to you. This would be nice. If so, I recommend that you send me an email with an outline of the structure before you start writing the paper.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; cursor: auto;\">Citations<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">Cite sources. For lecture or textbook readings it\u2019s OK to just cite in parenthesis e.g. (Lecture, day &#8230;) or (Slides, day &#8230;) or (Parfit, \u2019text\u2019 p. #). [For other sources give author\u2019s name and date in parenthesis and complete citation at end of paper: author, title, date, journal\/publisher or web address. These should not be included in the word count though. Any citation style is fine. ]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\"><br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; cursor: auto;\">Further tips<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">How to explain a position<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">: Explain<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">technical terms<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">.<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">Give examples<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">.<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">Contrast<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">it with other views.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">How to explain and defend an argument for a position<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">: i) State the argument in the stan- dard (numbered) format; ii) then defend each one of the premises; iii) when defending each premise you<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">might<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">want to respond to objections against one or another premise. [If I want to explain the premise that \u2018the body is divisible\u2019, for example, I can explain what \u2018divisible\u2019 means and what it doesn\u2019t mean; and then, to justify the premise, I can give an example of how I can divide my body. ]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">How to respond to an argument against a position<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">: i) First, you must state the argument in the standard (numbered) format; ii) second, you must<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">briefly<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">explain the argument [Briefly explain what do the premises mean and how they lead to the conclusion.] iii) finally, say<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">exactly<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">why you think the argument is not convincing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">\u2013<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">How to say exactly why an argument against a position is not convincing? You have to show that<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">one of the premises is not true<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">or<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">that<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">the premises don\u2019t support the conclusion<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">or<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">that the argument is<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">circular<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<li style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">* &nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">How to show that a premise is not true? Give an argument against it or give<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">a counter-example. (For example, if the premise is a conditional statement a statement of the form \u2018<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">IF<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">p<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">THEN<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">q<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">\u2019, then you have to tell a story where<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">p<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">is true but<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">q<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">is false. This will be a counter-example to this statement.)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">* &nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">How to show that the premises don\u2019t support the conclusion?<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<li style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">\u00b7 &nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">If the argument is deductive, you show that the premises do not support the conclusion by showing that the argument is not valid \u2014 that is, you have to tell a imagined story that, if true, would make the premises of<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">the argument true but the conclusion false.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">\u00b7 &nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">If the argument is an inference to the best explanation, you show that the<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">premises do not support the conclusion by showing that there is an alter- native explanation that is better than the one the argument concludes. Explain exactly why you think it\u2019s better. Is it more simple, closer to common sense, parsimonious? Why?<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">* &nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">To show that an argument is circular you have to explain exactly which premise depends on the conclusion being true, and why. [The paradigm case here is the argument from the bible to the existence of God. You can see it in the slides of the first week. ]<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">3 of 4<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; cursor: auto;\">Even more tips<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<div style=\"cursor: auto;\">\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">Examples and Imagination<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">: As you might have noticed from the previous tips,<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">examples<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">are really important. Philosophy is very abstract; examples help us thinking about abstract things. They sometimes help clarifying statements (premises and conclusions). They sometimes help justifying premises. And they sometimes help raising objections against statements. Thus, your paper will end up having many of them. This is how it\u2019s supposed to be.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">I mentioned many examples in classroom and on slides for these various purposes. The more<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">original<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">your examples are, the better. [That is, the more \u2018original\u2019 they are in the sense that we didn\u2019t talk about them in class, the more you show that you understood a statement and that you thought about why that statement is true or false.] So use your<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">imagination<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">. The more you do this, the better your paper will be.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">Clarity<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">: Be as clear as you can. Use simple prose. Besides the technical, philosophical terms, use words that you would normally use in a conversation. No need for fancy big words when a short one will do.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">Use space effectively<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">: Don\u2019t repeat points already made. (If you think you might not achieve the required number of words, remember that there is<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">always<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">something<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">substantial<span style=\"cursor: auto;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt; cursor: auto;\">to clarify, to exemplify, to explain or to justify. Don\u2019t assume that your reader knows the topic. Write as if your reader was a colleague who is not taking our course.)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Main instruction&nbsp;: \u2018Defend a view on personal identity, and use this view to support an answer to the question \u2018Can we survive the death of our bodies?\u2019.\u2019 Here is a suggestion for how to do so in&nbsp;detail: ? &nbsp;Introduction: This should be one short paragraph in which i) you indicate to the reader what will [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[56],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/23316"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23316"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/23316\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23316"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=23316"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=23316"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=23316"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}