{"id":19753,"date":"2024-04-06T08:15:35","date_gmt":"2024-04-06T08:15:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/the-argument-essay-purpose-to-persuade-audience-diverse-educated-adults-length-3-4-pages-900-1200-words-research-documentation-minimum-of-4-sources-with-mla-citations-visual-elem\/"},"modified":"2024-04-06T08:15:35","modified_gmt":"2024-04-06T08:15:35","slug":"the-argument-essay-purpose-to-persuade-audience-diverse-educated-adults-length-3-4-pages-900-1200-words-research-documentation-minimum-of-4-sources-with-mla-citations-visual-elem","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/the-argument-essay-purpose-to-persuade-audience-diverse-educated-adults-length-3-4-pages-900-1200-words-research-documentation-minimum-of-4-sources-with-mla-citations-visual-elem\/","title":{"rendered":"The Argument Essay Purpose: To persuade Audience: Diverse \/ Educated adults. Length: 3-4 pages (900-1200 words) Research & Documentation: Minimum of 4 sources with MLA citations Visual Element: At least one visual element"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/span>This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin\u2122.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Submit the final draft of your argument essay here.  Files should be in .docx or .pdf format.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Hide Rubrics<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n

Rubric Name: Argument Research Essay w visual 2022<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
Print<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
\n\n\n\n<\/thead>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Criteria<\/td>\n\n
Excellent<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/th>\n
\n
Acceptable<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/th>\n
\n
Needs improvement<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/th>\n
\n
Does not meet standards<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/th>\n
\n
Failing<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/th>\n
\n
Criterion Score<\/div>\n<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
\n
\n
\n
Thesis, Analysis & Focus<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
25 points<\/div>\n
The essay makes a clear and debatable claim that is interesting and takes into account the complexities of the issue. The essay remains focused on the claim throughout the essay. Excellent use of logic.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
20 points<\/div>\n
The essay makes a clear and debatable claim, but the claim is routine or uninspired. The essay ignores some of the complexities of the issue. Logic is acceptable.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
16.25 points<\/div>\n
The claim is vague, obvious or simplistic. Ideas are routine and avoid the complexities of the issue. Demonstrates a limited understanding of the topic. Includes logical errors or fallacies.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
10 points<\/div>\n
Thesis is confusing, contradictory or not-debatable. The ideas throughout the essay are often difficult to follow and demonstrate poor reasoning. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
7.5 points<\/div>\n
Essay fails to communicate a coherent claim or viewpoint.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
Score of Thesis, Analysis & Focus,<\/div>\n

\/ 25<\/p><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n
\n
\n
Context & Viewpoints<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
15.000001 points<\/div>\n
Demonstrates an excellent awareness of context, assumptions and opposing viewpoints. Accurately conveys context and viewpoints in a way that strengthens the argument.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
12 points<\/div>\n
Demonstrates a limited awareness of context and assumptions. Overlooks important contextual information that may help or hinder the argument. Shows limited understanding of opposing views.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
9.75 points<\/div>\n
Lacks a strong awareness of context, assumptions and opposing views. struggles to articulate and refute opposing views.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
6 points<\/div>\n
Little or no awareness of the context in which the debate occurs. Ideas are isolated from actual debates and views held on the topic.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
6 points<\/div>\n
stylistic problems make for difficult or uncomfortable reading<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
Score of Context & Viewpoints,<\/div>\n

\/ 15.000001<\/p><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n
\n
\n
Sources and Evidence<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
20 points<\/div>\n
Demonstrates skillful use of credible and relevant sources. Quotations are well integrated and effective in supporting the thesis.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
16 points<\/div>\n
Demonstrates acceptable use of relevant sources but some sources may lack credibility. Use of quotations is acceptable but some quotations may be poorly chosen or poorly integrated.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
13 points<\/div>\n
Demonstrates an attempt to use sources, but some sources are not relevant. Quotations are poorly integrated and may be irrelevant to the topic. May include incidental plagiarism.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
8 points<\/div>\n
Does not use credible, relevant sources in a way that supports the thesis. Quotations are absent or are not well integrated.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
0 points<\/div>\n
No apparent attempt to document sources. Plagiarized content.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
Score of Sources and Evidence,<\/div>\n

\/ 20<\/p><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n
\n
\n
grid.row2.label<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
15.000001 points<\/div>\n
Excellent organization. Strong introduction. Paragraphs are well constructed and effectively lead the reader through the argument. Excellent use of transitions and topic sentences<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
12 points<\/div>\n
Organization is acceptable, but could use improvement. Use of Transitions and topic sentences is inconsistent. Some paragraphs may be too long, misplaced or drift off topic.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
9.75 points<\/div>\n
Ideas are choppy \/ wandering paragraphs \/ lacks transitions and topic sentences<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
6 points<\/div>\n
poor organization detracts from ideas \/ difficult to follow<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
6 points<\/div>\n
disorganized \/ random<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
Score of grid.row2.label,<\/div>\n

\/ 15.000001<\/p><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n
\n
\n
Grammar & Mechanics<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
10 points<\/div>\n
Prose is fluent and graceful. Voice is suitable to the audience and purpose<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
8 points<\/div>\n
Prose is acceptable. May contain a few minor grammar or usage errors. Voice is suitable to the audience and purpose<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
6.5 points<\/div>\n
Several errors in grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, usage. Voice may not be suitable for the audience and purpose.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
4 points<\/div>\n
Grammar is not up to college standards. Remediation required.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
4 points<\/div>\n
severe grammatical problems. lacks mastery of English.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
Score of Grammar & Mechanics,<\/div>\n

\/ 10<\/p><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n
\n
\n
Documentation<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
10 points<\/div>\n
MLA format and citations are implemented correctly.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
8 points<\/div>\n
MLA format and citations contain a few minor errors.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
6.5 points<\/div>\n
MLA format \/ citations are incomplete and\/or not formatted correctly. In-text citations may not match the corresponding works cited entry.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
4 points<\/div>\n
Demonstrates inability to cite sources.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
0 points<\/div>\n
No attempt to cite sources in MLA style.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
Score of Documentation,<\/div>\n

\/ 10<\/p><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n
\n
\n
Visual Elements<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
5 points<\/div>\n
Relevant and engaging visual elements.Images are well integrated.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
4 points<\/div>\n
Use of images is acceptable, but the choice of image or it’s integration into the essay needs improvement<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
3.25 points<\/div>\n
Images lack relevance and\/or are not integrated into the argument.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
2 points<\/div>\n
Images are disconnected from the ideas of the essay. Images may be difficult to see or understand.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
0 points<\/div>\n
No visual elements included in the essay<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
Score of Visual Elements,<\/div>\n

\/ 5<\/p><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
Total<\/span><\/p>\n
\n
\n
Score of Argument Research Essay w visual 2022,<\/div>\n

\/ 100.000002<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
<\/div>\n
\n

Overall Score<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Excellent<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n
90 points minimum<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

Acceptable<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n
72.5 points minimum<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

Needs improvement<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n
52.5 points minimum<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

Does not meet standards<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n
31.75 points minimum<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Turnitin\u2122 This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin\u2122. Instructions Submit the final draft of your argument essay here.  Files should be in .docx or .pdf format. Hide Rubrics Rubric Name: Argument Research Essay w visual 2022 Print Criteria Excellent Acceptable Needs improvement Does not meet standards Failing Criterion Score Thesis, Analysis & Focus 25 points […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[14],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/19753"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19753"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/19753\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19753"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=19753"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=19753"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=19753"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}