{"id":14456,"date":"2024-03-04T02:37:45","date_gmt":"2024-03-04T02:37:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/explanatory-research-why-does-the-court-welcome-eyewitness-testimony-cases-solved-with-and-without-eyewitness-testimony\/"},"modified":"2024-03-04T02:37:45","modified_gmt":"2024-03-04T02:37:45","slug":"explanatory-research-why-does-the-court-welcome-eyewitness-testimony-cases-solved-with-and-without-eyewitness-testimony","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/explanatory-research-why-does-the-court-welcome-eyewitness-testimony-cases-solved-with-and-without-eyewitness-testimony\/","title":{"rendered":"Explanatory Research: Why does the court welcome eyewitness testimony? (cases solved with and without eyewitness testimony)"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
\n

For two articles (<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>Albright, <\/span>Wixted<\/span>) there is a link (https:\/\/) that can be copy and pasted but for one (Witcher) pictures of the doc was attached.<\/span><\/u><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/span><\/p>\n

Annotated Bibliography<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n

Albright, T. D. (2017). Why eyewitnesses fail. <\/span><\/span>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America<\/span><\/span>, <\/span><\/span>114<\/span><\/span>(30), 7758\u20137764. <\/span><\/span><\/span>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1706891114<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span> <\/span>
<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Witcher, C. L. (2009). United States v. Smith: Exposition of Eyewitness Identification Expert Testimony and the Role of 403. <\/span><\/span>American Journal of Trial Advocacy<\/span><\/span>, <\/span><\/span>33<\/span><\/span>(2), 393\u2013409.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2018). Rethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory. <\/span><\/span>Perspectives on Psychological Science<\/span><\/span>, <\/span><\/span>13<\/span><\/span>(3), 324\u2013335. <\/span><\/span>https:\/\/doi-org.libproxy.csudh.edu\/10.1177\/1745691617734878<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

\n

An annotated bibliography is a list of related scholarly journal articles that are followed<\/span>
by a brief (usually approximately 150 word) descriptive and evaluative paragraph, the<\/span>
annotation. The Annotated Bibliography is a list of scholarly journals and articles about<\/span>
a defined and specific research topic. They are the basis from which to write larger<\/span>
research papers.<\/span><\/p>\n

An annotated bibliography is NOT an ABSTRACT. An abstract is a descriptive<\/span>
summary which is found at the beginning of journal articles. Annotations are descriptive<\/span>
and critical; they expose the author\u2019s point of view, clarity and appropriateness of<\/span>
expression, and authority.<\/span>
<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
The annotated bibliography summarizes the central theme and scope of the articles and<\/span>
includes one or more sentences on the following:<\/span>
(a) evaluate the authority or background of the author;<\/span>
(b) comments on the intended audience;<\/span>
(c) compares or contrast this work with another you have cited; and<\/span>
(d) explain how this work illuminates the topic being studied.<\/span>

<\/span><\/div>\n
The example provided includes the elements of a good annotated bibliography as each of<\/span>
the components listed are clearly communicated in the annotation.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n
    \n
  1. Explanation of main points and\/or purpose of the work\u2014basically, its thesis\u2014<\/span>
    which shows among other things that you have read and thoroughly understand<\/span>
    the source.<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Verification or critique of the authority or qualifications of the author.<\/span>
    <\/span><\/li>\n
  3. Comments on the worth, effectiveness, and usefulness of the work in terms of<\/span>
    both the topic being researched and\/or your own research project.<\/span>
    <\/span><\/span><\/li>\n
  4. The point of view or perspective from which the work was written. For instance,<\/span>
    you may note whether the author seemed to have particular biases or was trying to<\/span>
    \n
    reach a particular audience.<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/li>\n
  5. \n
    Relevant links to other work done in the area, like <\/span>elated sources, possibly<\/span><\/div>\n

    including a comparison with some of those already on your list. You may want to<\/span>
    establish connections to other aspects of the same argument or opposing views.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Example:<\/span><\/div>\n

    <\/span>Waite, L. J., Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and<\/span>
    the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults.<\/span> <\/span>American<\/span>
    Sociological Review, 51, 541-554.<\/span> <\/span>51,<\/span> <\/span>541-554.<\/span><\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/div>\n
    The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data<\/span>
    from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test<\/span>
    their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes,<\/span>
    values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional<\/span>
    sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while<\/span>
    the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from<\/span>
    parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in<\/span>
    attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below<\/span>
    shows no significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of<\/span>
    nonfamily living.<\/span>
    <\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    For two articles (Albright, Wixted) there is a link (https:\/\/) that can be copy and pasted but for one (Witcher) pictures of the doc was attached. Annotated Bibliography  Albright, T. D. (2017). Why eyewitnesses fail. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(30), 7758\u20137764. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1706891114  Witcher, C. L. (2009). United States v. Smith: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/14456"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14456"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/14456\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=14456"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=14456"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=14456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}