{"id":10268,"date":"2024-01-31T10:30:55","date_gmt":"2024-01-31T10:30:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/an-issue-pertaining-to-family-health-incorporating-the-relevant-sustainable-development-goals-sdgs\/"},"modified":"2024-01-31T10:30:55","modified_gmt":"2024-01-31T10:30:55","slug":"an-issue-pertaining-to-family-health-incorporating-the-relevant-sustainable-development-goals-sdgs","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/questions\/an-issue-pertaining-to-family-health-incorporating-the-relevant-sustainable-development-goals-sdgs\/","title":{"rendered":"an issue pertaining to family health, incorporating the relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)."},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Assessment
\n Task: <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

You are required to submit a 3000 word <\/b>essay <\/b>that critically analyses an issue pertaining to family health,
\n incorporating the relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

\u00b7        
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>Your work should discuss a particular
\n area\/community in a country other than that of your citizenship or your
\n current employment that suffers from a specific public health issue
\n associated with family health that is relevant to SDGs. This means that you
\n cannot choose the country in which you were born, have residency, or are
\n working in. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

\u00b7        
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>The discussion should focus on a specific
\n sustainable development goal and discuss a relevant target and up to 2 indicators\/targets. For
\n example, you might choose SDG2, Target 2.1, target indicator 2.1.1 or SDG 6,
\n target 6.3, indicators 6.3.1 and 6.3.2. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

\u00b7        
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>Your focus should be connected to
\n women\u2019s health (above 18) or older adults (above 50) in your chosen country. <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

You work will need to include the
\n following points:<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

1.   
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>Critical analysis of the topic\/SDG
\n using relevant research and literature that is relevant to the host country; (20 Marks)<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

2.   
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>Why the topic, SDG, SDG target and
\n relevant indicator(s) is important to family health? (20 Marks)<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

3.   
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>Challenges,
\n barriers, strategies (short & long term) and solutions for the topic\/SDG concentrating
\n on the selected target\/indicator(s) in the host country including non-achievement
\n of the selected SDG target and related indicator(s).  <\/span>(30
\n Marks)<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

4.   
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>Recommendations
\n and action for the immediate future should be included in the summary. One of
\n these recommendations will be taken forward to assessment point 2. (20 marks)<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

5.   
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>The
\n submitted work should follow appropriate academic conventions i.e.
\n spelling\/grammar\/referencing (10
\n Marks)<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/span><\/u><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Learning
\n Outcomes to be assessed <\/span><\/b>(as specified in the validated module
\n descriptor <\/span>https:\/\/icis.southwales.ac.uk\/<\/a>
\n <\/span>): <\/i><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Grading
\n Criteria:<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Please see
\n <\/span>Level M Assessment Grid below<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Student
\n Name(s):<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Feedback\/feed-forward
\n <\/span><\/b>(linked to assessment criteria):<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00b7        
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>Areas where you have done <\/span>well:<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

\u00b7     
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>Feedback from this assessment to
\n help you to improve future <\/span>assessments:<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

\u00b7     
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>Other comments<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Mark:<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Marker\u2019s
\n Signature:<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Date:<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Work on this module has been marked, double
\n marked\/moderated in line with USW procedures.<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Provisional mark only: subject to change and\/or
\n confirmation by the Assessment Board<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Part C: Reflections on Assessment<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

(to be completed by student \u2013 optional)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Use of
\n previous feedback:<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

In this assessment, I have taken\/took note of the
\n following points in feedback on previous work:<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Please indicate which of the following you feel\/felt
\n applies\/applied to your submitted work<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

\u00b7        
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>A reasonable attempt. I could
\n have developed some of <\/span>the
\n sections <\/span>further.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00b7        
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>A good attempt, displaying my <\/span>understanding and learning, with
\n analysis in some <\/span>parts.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00b7        
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>A very good attempt. The work
\n demonstrates my<\/span> <\/span>clear understanding of the learning
\n supported by relevant literature <\/span>and <\/span>scholarly work with good analysis and <\/span>evaluation.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00b7        
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>An excellent attempt, with clear
\n application of literature and scholarly work, demonstrating significant
\n analysis and <\/span>evaluation.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

What I found <\/span>most
\n difficult about this assessment:<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

The areas where I would value\/would have valued feedback:<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/div>\n



\n<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Level M Assessment Grid<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Grade<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Knowledge & Understanding<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Analysis<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Synthesis \/
\n Creativity<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Evaluation<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Distinction<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

70-100<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Evidence
\n of extensive reading. Well referenced and expressed in own words.
\n Demonstrates systematic, detailed and comprehensive knowledge of a field of
\n study.  <\/span>Confidently handles issues,
\n which are complex or specialist in nature.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Consistently
\n analytical. Selects and uses with confidence the most appropriate analytical
\n frameworks to examine the key issues of an area of knowledge. Can analyse
\n complex issues where knowledge is incomplete. Analysis is purposeful and
\n illuminates practical considerations.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Devises
\n an effective and imaginative structure. 
\n <\/span>Shows originality in the practical application of advanced knowledge.
\n Can discuss application of knowledge to complex or novel situations.  <\/span>Is able to pull together and give coherence
\n to information \/ ideas from diverse sources. 
\n <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Evaluates
\n alternative views of complex or novel situations, based on a clear grasp of
\n all relevant viewpoints and an even-handed discussion of their relative
\n merits. Justifies conclusions and recommendations and shows awareness of
\n their limitations. Critiques the rigour and value of the different positions
\n taken or methods used. Where appropriate, makes critical use of own
\n experiences.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Merit<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

60-69<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Evidence
\n of extensive reading. Well referenced and expressed in own words.
\n Demonstrates comprehensive & detailed knowledge of complex issues or
\n specialist knowledge. Understanding of current issues in the field and the provisional
\n nature of knowledge.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Consistently
\n analytical. Considers abstract and contextual information. Identifies key
\n features of advanced or complex issues. 
\n <\/span>Selects from a range of methods \/ techniques appropriate to the
\n subject for clarifying the information.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Effective
\n structure used to present arguments. 
\n <\/span>Draws on a variety of sources. 
\n <\/span>Consistently addresses the practical application of information \/
\n ideas with some originality. Can discuss application of knowledge to complex
\n or novel situations.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Evaluates
\n alternative views of complex or novel situations. Discusses reliability,
\n validity and significance of information. Draws conclusions and makes
\n recommendations that are justified by the arguments presented. Where
\n appropriate, makes critical use of own experiences.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Good<\/span><\/b> Pass<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

50-59<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Evidence
\n of wide reading. Well referenced and expressed in own words. Demonstrates
\n comprehensive and\/or detailed knowledge<\/u>. Aware of provisional nature
\n of knowledge.<\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Analyses
\n aspects of the subject. Considers abstract and contextual information<\/u>.
\n Identifies important features of advanced or complex issues.<\/u>  <\/span>Considers analytical methods \/ techniques
\n appropriate to the subject.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Structures
\n arguments well.  <\/span>Draws on a variety of
\n sources.  <\/span>Discusses the practical
\n application of information \/ ideas<\/u>, showing some originality.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Can
\n evaluate alternative views of complex or novel situations.<\/span><\/u> Questions reliability, validity and significance of
\n information.  <\/span>Where required, explores own
\n experiences and views and their implications. Conclusions and recommendations
\n are well argued and reasoned.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Clear<\/span><\/b> Pass<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

41-49<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Evidence
\n of wide reading. Well referenced and expressed in own words.  <\/span>Demonstrates familiarity with  <\/span>of the body of relevant knowledge and some
\n current \/ advanced issues.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Identifies
\n significant features of issues, including those which are advanced or
\n complex. Makes appropriate use of 
\n <\/span>methods\/techniques for analysis. Able to consider incomplete or
\n contradictory areas of knowledge.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Structures
\n arguments adequately<\/span><\/u>. Discusses the application of
\n information \/ ideas in an appropriate way. <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Can
\n evaluate alternative approaches\/ viewpoints in complex or novel situations.
\n Shows awareness of issues of reliability, validity and significance of
\n information.  <\/span>Where required, explores
\n own experiences and views and their implications. Conclusions and
\n recommendations are supported by the arguments presented.<\/u><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Narrow<\/span><\/b> Pass<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

40<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

The work incompletely meets the
\n criteria for a clear pass  <\/span>grade for
\n some descriptors but demonstrates attainment of assessment criteria; or <\/i><\/b>the
\n work does not achieve the standard equivalent to D2 for one or more
\n descriptors but is redeemed by a good standard in the others; or<\/i><\/b>
\n the work fulfils the criteria for a pass in relation to all descriptors but
\n only meets the minimum requirements of assessment criteria.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Narrow<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Fail<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

30-39<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

Reading<\/span> inadequate or not fully understood OR Knowledge of the
\n field of study is limited and not consistent with module learning outcomes. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

Where
\n present, analysis overlooks the key features OR uses unsuitable
\n methods\/criteria. Does not address the assessment criteria.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

Structure
\n has problems with coherence or consistency. 
\n <\/span>Limited application of theory to practice.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

Lacks
\n a balanced approach or adequate supportive evidence. Lacks discrimination or
\n does not reach a well reasoned conclusion.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Clear Fail<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

0-29<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

Very
\n limited evidence of appropriate reading. 
\n <\/span>Very limited knowledge base<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

Little
\n evidence of analysis. Does not address the assessment criteria.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

Poor
\n structure and little attempt to link theory with practice.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

Little
\n attempt to formulate an argument or draw conclusions.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Assessment Task:   You are required to submit a 3000 word essay that critically analyses an issue pertaining to family health, incorporating the relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).   \u00b7         Your work should discuss a particular area\/community in a country other than that of your citizenship or your current employment that suffers from a specific […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[21],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/10268"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10268"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/10268\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=10268"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=10268"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.writemyessays.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=10268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}