Would it be unethical to withhold approval for government mandated newborn genetic screening programs for inheritable diseases?

Write me a disccussion post answering the discussion questions and specfic question:
The general question you must respond to in THIS Discussion Forum is: Would it be unethical to withhold approval for government mandated newborn genetic screening programs for inheritable diseases, or for government supported genetic testing programs for infants and adolescents diagnosed as carriers of inherited diseases, inasmuch as (though medical science and eugenic interests may deny it) our native intuition is that all men are created equal, and that all persons, including our youth, should be free from the use by others of knowledge of one’s genetic vulnerabilities, which use by others might serve to encumber one’s own right to determine his or her future without discrimination? The specific question is, supposing that mandated genetic screening for (and then the governmental recording of) inherited genetic vulnerabilities borne by newborns, may be in the best interests of our children, should the government not expand the mandate for genetic screening to unborn children (not merely newborn infants), and encourage prenatal (including pre-implantation) diagnosis and prevention for treatable vulnerabilities, and also amend existing preconditions of parental consent (or non-consent) to disclosure of such governmental records concerning a child’s genetic identity, in such a way that the parental decision of disclosure or nondisclosure of such information does not disparage the youth’s nascent yet accountable decision-making capacity to create his own future, prior to his emancipation from his parents?
Only use the reference provided: Must use the bioethic textbook