Construct a 1-page reflection in which you explain how your personal
experiences, self-identity, bias, and privilege might impact your
community and decision making. Consider ways in which you interact, or
do not interact, within your community and how personal experiences,
self-identity, bias, and or privilege motivate or drive these decisions.
NURS_3021_Module1_Assignment1_Rubric
NURS_3021_Module1_Assignment1_Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Explain how personal experiences, self-identity, bias, and privilege impacts community and decision making.
16 to >12.0 pts
Masters Expectations
The response comprehensively and clearly reflects on experience, identity, bias, and privilege.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the reflection.
12 to >10.0 pts
Achieves Expectations
The response reflects on experience, identity, bias, and privilege.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the reflection.
10 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The response inaccurately and vaguely reflects on experience, identity, and privilege, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is missing.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Explain community interaction and non-interaction as related to decision making.
12 to >9.0 pts
Masters Expectations
The response comprehensively and clearly reflects on community interaction and non-interaction.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the reflection.
9 to >8.0 pts
Achieves Expectations
The response reflects on community interaction and non-interaction.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the reflection.
8 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The response inaccurately and vaguely reflects on community interaction and non-interaction, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is missing.
12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Explain how personal experience and bias impact decision making.
12 to >9.0 pts
Masters Expectations
The response comprehensively and clearly reflects on experience, bias, and decision making.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the reflection.
9 to >8.0 pts
Achieves Expectations
The response reflects on experience, bias, and decision making.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the reflection.
8 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The response reflects on experience, bias, and decision making.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the reflection.
12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Professional writing: Context, organization, audience, purpose, tone, style, clarity, flow
5 to >3.4 pts
Masters Expectations
Demonstrates full awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose
Content is generally clear, logical, and well organized with appropriate sentence and paragraph structure.
Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free of bias.
Style is consistently appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context.
Mostly free of spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors
3.4 to >3.0 pts
Achieves Expectations
Demonstrates some awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose
Content is mostly clear, logical, and well organized with
adequate sentence and paragraph structure.
Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free of bias.
Style is mostly appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context.
Contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors
3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Demonstrates minimal awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose
Content lacks clarity, logic, and/or discernible organization; does not use proper sentence and paragraph structure.
Tone is not professional/scholarly and/or contains bias.
Style is inconsistent with a professional setting/workplace context.
Professional writing: Originality, source credibility, and attribution of ideas
5 to >3.5 pts
Masters Expectations
Writing
fully reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to
reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to
support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references
in APA format.
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Achieves Expectations
Writing
adequately reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to
reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to
support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references
in APA format.
3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Writing
does not reflect original thought and paraphrasing and does not adhere
to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to
support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references
in APA format.
5 pts
Total Points:
50
Ace Your Assignments! 🏆 - Hire a Professional Essay Writer Now!
Complete the order form by providing as much information as possible, and then click the submit button.
Choose writer
Select your preferred writer for the project, or let us assign the best writer for you.
Add funds
Allocate funds to your wallet. You can release these funds to the writer incrementally, after each section is completed and meets your expected quality.
Ready
Download the finished work. Review the paper and request free edits if needed. Optionally, rate the writer and leave a review.