Ethics, The difference between “Consequentialism” and “Non-Consequentialism” (Capital Punishment)

In one full paragraph, please explain the difference between “Consequentialism” and “Non-Consequentialism.” In your explanation, please use at least one example of an ethical decision that you have *personally* had to consider. (In other words, how would a Consequentialist approach the decision you had to make? How would a Non-Consequentialist approach that very same decision?) Also, please briefly describe at least one example of a Consequentialist theory and one example of a Non-Consequentialist theory. Then, in one full paragraph, please fully explain how a Consequentialist might approach the issue of Capital Punishment. Next, in another full paragraph, please fully explain how a Non-Consequentialist might approach the issue of Capital Punishment. (Note that there might be Consequentialist arguments *for* capital punishment as well as Consequentialist arguments *against* Capital punishment. The same is true for Non-Consequentialist theories.) Lastly, in at least one full paragraph, please indicate which approach to the issue of Capital Punishment you believe arrives at the most justified answer. Defend your position.  I will look for three direct quotations from our course text.