I’ve drafted a full-length model essay (under 1000 words) in preparation for the GY448 Section A exam. The essay responds to the question:
“Critically discuss the role of ‘objective’ evidence in the planning process. What might planners be aware of when gathering and/or interpreting objective evidence?”
In writing this response, I’ve closely followed the guidance and expectations outlined in the course material, particularly:
- Required readings and seminar sources, including:
- Mehdic et al. (2020) – on subjective judgement in Environmental Impact Assessment;
- Willis (1982/2024) – the political use of expert evidence in the Woodhouse Colliery case;
- Zaitsava et al. (2022) – on cognition and bias in data-driven decision-making.
- Conceptual framing from lecture and seminar slides, including:
- The historical shift from Systems Planning Theory toward more deliberative approaches;
- The idea that planning is a hybrid between science and art, and that ‘objective’ evidence is embedded within political and institutional contexts;
- Discussions on bias in big data, decision-making under uncertainty, and the social construction of what is treated as ‘fact’.
The essay aims to demonstrate not just understanding of the content, but also the ability to critically evaluate the limitations of objectivity in planning evidence and to connect theoretical insights with practical examples.