A psychological mechanism to understand the shift from innovation resistance of smartphone ai voice assistants in greece to acceptance intention through the lens of social influence theory

163 responses to a questionnaire via Google forms. In general, if it is possible, I can send you what I have done (theoretical framework and the results of the questionnaires in an spss file) and then make corrections where you deem necessary and complete it. Certainly the analysis and extraction of the results requires work. I am sending you what I have done so far. below is the feedback from my professor regarding chapter 1:What you have written in the first chapter, such as the research aim, etc., is for later in the methodology chapter. It is better to keep the structure that you have written at the end of what you sent and distribute the length accordingly based on the specifications of the EAP. Also, for the references, the style is correct, but try to include modern sources as much as possible after 2010.Feedback from my professor for chapters 2-4: The chapters show that there has been a study of the literature and a synthesis of the parts. If I would change anything, it would be the analysis per subsection especially in chapters 2 and 3. You write many cases, chapters, factors and the analysis in each is 2-3 lines. It needs more to show the analysis, the connection and your contribution or your own thinking.For the 4th chapter, the essence of the thesis comes out. An explanation of the logic of the hypotheses is needed. Why you propose them and what we will do with the knowledge from their answer. Also make sure that for all these questions – hypotheses that are important you have the appropriate measurement tools later. Proceed based on the plan.Also the feedback for the analysis: The descriptive statistics are fine. For pearson r it should be + or – from 0.3 and above For the rest I agree to do ANOVA & T test for the basic questions of the thesis.