Introduction
- Briefly introduce the referendum: date, question, and the result.
- State its significance for UK constitutional politics.
- Present thesis: explore both campaign strategy and legacy to assess “success.”
1. Context and Background
- Historical background of Scottish nationalism and devolution.
- The rise of the SNP and the political climate in 2014.
- Importance of this referendum in UK political history.
2. Campaign Strategies
Yes Scotland:
- Positive, civic nationalist tone — emphasized fairness, democracy, and Scottish control over policy.
- Focus on progressive values and rejection of austerity.
- Weaknesses: lack of clarity on currency, EU membership, and economic projections (especially over oil).
Better Together:
- Focused on risks of leaving — economic instability, pensions, loss of influence.
- Criticised as negative but effective in swaying undecided voters.
- Supported by UK-wide elites and most of the media.
3. Role of Media, Political Elites, and “The Vow”
- Most newspapers backed the Union — alleged media bias.
- UK leaders made last-minute promises for more devolved powers (“The Vow”) — helped secure some undecided voters.
- Trust issues and whether these promises were fulfilled post-referendum.
4. Civic Engagement and Legacy
- Turnout: 84.6% — massive public involvement, especially among youth (16–17-year-olds voted for the first time).
- Political awakening in Scotland — surge in SNP membership post-referendum.
- Although the “Yes” campaign lost, it reshaped Scottish politics and kept independence on the agenda — intensified after Brexit (2016).
5. Was the Campaign a Success or Failure?
- Failure in goal: independence was not achieved.
- Success in impact: shifted political discourse, sustained civic nationalism, and influenced future referendums.
- Demonstrates how referendum “success” is not only measured by the vote outcome.
Conclusion
- Summarise key findings: campaign was strategically flawed but powerful in mobilisation and political legacy.
- Reflect on what this case tells us about referendum campaigns in general: emotional appeals, uncertainty, elite influence, and long-term change.
- Possible link to future referendums , Brexit as a contrast)
references:
- Tierney, Stephen (2015). “The Scottish Independence Referendum: A Model of Good Practice in Direct Democracy?” – International Journal of Constitutional Law.
- Henderson, Ailsa, et al. (2016). “Scottish Public Opinion and the Independence Referendum: What Did We Learn?” – Political Insight.
- Johns, Robert & Mitchell, James (2016). “Takeover, Capture, or Merger? Scottish Party Membership after the Independence Referendum” – Political Studies Review.
- Tierney, S. (2015). “The Scottish Independence Referendum: A Model of Good Practice in Direct Democracy?”International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(2), pp. 622–638.
- Hassan, G. (2014). “After the Referendum: The Future of Scottish Politics.” Renewal: A Journal of Social Democracy, 22(3/4), pp. 48–56.
- Johns, R., Mitchell, J., Denver, D., & Carman, C. (2013). “Constitution or Competence? The SNP’s Re-election in 2011.” Political Studies, 61(1), pp. 158–178.
- Henderson, A., Jeffery, C., & Liñeira, R. (2016). “National Identity or National Interest: Scottish Voters and the Constitutional Question.” Scottish Affairs, 25(2), pp. 170–192.
- Liñeira, R. & Henderson, A. (2015). “National Identity and Attitudes to Independence.” In: Scotland’s Referendum and the Media: National and International Perspectives (edited volume