Microsoft Majorana-1: Comprehensive review and analysis of both the dynamics of efforts to develop innovative technologies/approaches, and the approaches being taken to push forward innovative trajectories.

I WILL ATTACH PAPERS ONE AND TWO AS WORD DOCUMENTS TO BASE THIS OFF OF. HERE IS THE ASSIGNMENT PROMPT: Your final paper is designed to integrate the first two parts of your research in a more comprehensive reviewand analysis of both the dynamics of efforts to develop innovative technologies/approaches, and the approaches
being taken to push forward innovative trajectories. It is required that you relate your case back to concepts,
theories, or empirical cases discussed/reviewed in the class. Moreover, if we discuss potentially relevant
databases or sources of information in class (or in feedback on your paper), I would expect you to use that data
or explain why it is NOT useful or relevant. More generally, in your paper, you should:
a) Provide a review and analysis of your technology/field/agency/case trajectory, including key
aspects/trends concerning the technology/firm/agency’s developmental pathway, as well as obstacles to
and prospects for ongoing development. This should integrate the key findings – concerning the
“internal” operations of your firm/technology history, with an analysis of the institutional environment
that supported it. – e.g., the findings from your first two papers. What should we take away as key
lessons from your technology/firm developmental trajectory? Note that a thorough account that
synthesizes and extends your first two papers around a core thematic is sufficient for the paper.
However, the areas below may be appropriate ways to extend the discussion, depending on your case.
b) If relevant, you may wish to discuss the social consequences of your technology, or vis a vis the how
your technology/firm/industry is governed. In other words, as we will discuss, technologies can have
both positive and negative impacts on social patterns; we shouldn’t assume that the effects of a given
technology are entirely beneficial. More broadly, are there lessons we can learn about the governance of
your issue/technology/field? If you believe these kinds of issues are important to your technology, field,
and/or firm’s history, then you can provide a concise but pointed discussion.
c) Similarly, if relevant (not required), you may wish to provide a policy analysis: given your
firm’s/agency’s operations (and/or the developmental trajectory of the technology), what kinds of
policies would appear to be useful in (1) fostering greater innovation in your technology area? (or to
suppress it, if that appears to be the optimal solution in your view!); (2) to generate positive ‘social’
and/or economic outcomes if technological innovations continue to develop in your field (or ceases to
do so). If you have studied a historical case, then your analysis should capture what you think we can
learn from it. If you discuss a recent case, you can compare your case to others from class, and/or
discuss key issues that should be addressed as the technological or firm trajectory moves forward.
Your paper should be approximately 10-12 pages, plus bibliography. Use the same format as on prior papers.
You can draw upon – and use text – from past papers. But your final paper should stand by itself.
THE CLASS MATERIALS DISCUSSED IN PAPERS ONE AND TWO SHOULD BE ENOUGH TO TALK ABOUT IN PAPER THREE. THANK YOU, I HAVE SO MUCH WORK AND THIS IS A BREADTH CLASS FOR ME – NOT EVEN FOR MY MAJOR. I JUST NEED TO GET AN 85 OR HIGER ON THE PAPER. THANK YOU.