Program competency #2. Advocate to address a public health priority.
The purpose of an advocacy statement is to express your view, supported by evidence, about a topic, usually to a politician or a political office, in order to promote a position. In public health, these advocacy letters take on an important role in promoting a public health issue that a member of the public health community feels is not being adequately addressed by those in power.
https://linguaholic.com/linguablog/how-to-write-an-advocacy-letter/Links to an external site.
(This website should give you some basics as to what must go in this letter)
Here are some basic requirements for your advocacy letter:
Pick a public health issue you feel is not adequately addressed either locally, on a state level or on a national/international level. (Topic examples: gun control, vaccines in school, combatting obesity, school lunches, food insecurity, access to healthcare, drug abuse, reproductive health, sex education, LGBTQIA+ issues in PH, etc.) No topic is off-limits. (Part 1)
Then, research your topic so you can make fact-based salient points in your advocacy statement. (part 2)
The requirements of the research paper are as follows:
- The paper should be 3-4 pages, not exceeding 4 pages double spaced, using college-level English, and including at least five appropriately cited sources from peer-reviewed journals and at least five other sources. (total of 10 sources at least)
- The paper should describe the research done, the purpose of the letter, and the reason why this issue is so important to public health.
- The language used in the research paper may also be used in the advocacy letter.
- The paper MUST be written in the third person; the advocacy letter should be in the first person.
- Be sure to proofread your paper.
Background research paper
40 points total
Identification of issue, population at risk
- Does the paper identify the issue and the population at risk?
- Does the paper identify the law or policy that needs to be created or changed?
- Is the correct level of government identified for the issue?
0 – 15 points
Effective use of research
- Does the reference list contain a desirable range of appropriate sources, including several professional publications? (Minimum 5 sources from peer-reviewed journals; at least 5 other sources)
- Specific examples used to support assertions
- Limited use of generalities
- Critical thinking/analysis evident
0 – 15 points
Writing quality
- Does the research paper conform to College level standards, 3-4 pages, double-spaced
- Does the reference style follow that of public health journals (Chicago, Vancouver or BMJ)?
0 – 10 points