the essay is about the following prompt
prompt:
- In Eichmann in Jerusalem, Arendt makes a connection between poor mastery over language, bad thinking and implication in political violence. Identify 2 examples from each text (Arendt and Shipler) where this connection seems to be at play. In each case, explain how flaws in logic operate to justify political violence.
DIRECTIONS: Please answer THE questions below in a thesis-based, well supported essay. Your essay should include DIRECT ANALYSIS of details from the text, include textual citations in MLA format, and be claim-driven. Pay particular attention to claim-based topic sentences that advance your thesis statement. Examples should be taken from both books and they should include page numbers from the books. 6 pages double-spaced.
The only sources permitted are:
H Arendt- Eichmann in Jerusalem
D Shipler- Arab and Jew
The essay should be 6 pages and then + the Works Cited with the two permitted sources.
The outline she provided us with is –
Title(should be the summary of prompt) Subtitle(Come up with something interesting related to the essay topic).
A.Thesis:
B. Body Sections- presenting logic
B1- Claim #1
B2- Claim #2
B3- Claim #3
C. Conclusion
heavy pages of history carry the footprints of the delicate interplay of
implemented linguistic inadequacy and flawed reasoning which foster the
justification and perpetuation of political violence on the moral fabric of
society, leading to the erosion of societal integrity and the perpetuation of
cycles of aggression and cycles of conflict.(Maybe its useful)